QoS-QoE Translation with Large Language Model

QoS-QoE translation is a fundamental problem in multimedia systems because it characterizes how measurable system and network conditions affect user-perceived experience. Although many prior studies have examined this relationship, their findings are often developed for specific setups and remain scattered across papers, experimental settings, and reporting formats, limiting systematic reuse, cross-scenario generalization, and large-scale analysis. To address this gap, we first introduce QoS-QoE Translation dataset, a source-grounded dataset of structured QoS-QoE relationships from the multimedia literature, with a focus on video streaming related tasks. We construct the dataset through an automated pipeline that combines paper curation, QoS-QoE relationship extraction, and iterative data evaluation. Each record preserves the extracted relationship together with parameter definitions, supporting evidence, and contextual metadata. We further evaluate the capability of large language models (LLMs) on QoS-QoE translation, both before and after supervised fine-tuning on our dataset, and show strong performance on both continuous-value and discrete-label prediction in bidirectional translation, from QoS-QoE and QoE-QoS. Our dataset provides a foundation for benchmarking LLMs in QoS-QoE translation and for supporting future LLM-based reasoning for multimedia quality prediction and optimization. The complete dataset and code are publicly available at https://yyu6969.github.io/qos-qoe-translation-page/, for full reproducibility and open access.

DRPG (Decompose, Retrieve, Plan, Generate): An Agentic Framework for Academic Rebuttal

Despite the growing adoption of large language models (LLMs) in scientific research workflows, automated support for academic rebuttal, a crucial step in academic communication and peer review, remains largely underexplored. Existing approaches typically rely on off-the-shelf LLMs or simple pipelines, which struggle with long-context understanding and often fail to produce targeted and persuasive responses. In this paper, we propose DRPG, an agentic framework for automatic academic rebuttal generation that operates through four steps: Decompose reviews into atomic concerns, Retrieve relevant evidence from the paper, Plan rebuttal strategies, and Generate responses accordingly. Notably, the Planner in DRPG reaches over 98% accuracy in identifying the most feasible rebuttal direction. Experiments on data from top-tier conferences demonstrate that DRPG significantly outperforms existing rebuttal pipelines and achieves performance beyond the average human level using only an 8B model. Our analysis further demonstrates the effectiveness of the planner design and its value in providing multi-perspective and explainable suggestions. We also showed that DRPG works well in a more complex multi-round setting. These results highlight the effectiveness of DRPG and its potential to provide high-quality rebuttal content and support the scaling of academic discussions. Codes for this work are available at https://github.com/ulab-uiuc/DRPG-RebuttalAgent.