Salience Induction against Multi-Hop RAG Agents: Threat and Defense

Agentic retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems increasingly retrieve external evidence and orchestrate tools for knowledge-intensive applications. In Multi-Hop question answering, agents chain facts across documents. Existing defenses focus on content poisoning, which injects false facts, and prompt injection, which embeds directives. We identify a third attack surface: the salience channel, through which fact position, emphasis, framing, and semantic proximity can redirect reasoning even when all retrieved claims are true and no instructions are present. We formalize Salience Induction as truth-preserving edits that redirect Multi-Hop attribute binding while leaving the retrieval trace semantically intact. We define six Salience-Editing operator classes and build an iterative proposer-verifier pipeline under factual and stealth constraints. We also introduce SalientWiki-MH, a decoy-annotated Multi-Hop benchmark. Evaluations across five frontier model families (GPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, and Qwen) and three agent architectures (ReAct, Reflexion, and tool-calling) show broad generalization. Under a 30% edit budget, Salience Induction achieves an 83.3% attack success rate; the strongest evaluated baseline defense leaves 75.7% post-defense ASR. Untargeted rewriting further reduces attacks only by degrading neutral task success. Our lightweight input-side defense, Salience Normalization, reduces attack success to 15.3% under standard attacks and 23.6% under an adaptive attack. These results show that truthfulness and instruction filtering alone are insufficient: robust agentic RAG also requires defenses against salience-relevance decoupling.

Reasoning-Style Poisoning of LLM Agents via Stealthy Style Transfer: Process-Level Attacks and Runtime Monitoring in RSV Space

Large Language Model (LLM) agents relying on external retrieval are increasingly deployed in high-stakes environments. While existing adversarial attacks primarily focus on content falsification or instruction injection, we identify a novel, process-oriented attack surface: the agent's reasoning style. We propose Reasoning-Style Poisoning (RSP), a paradigm that manipulates how agents process information rather than what they process. We introduce Generative Style Injection (GSI), an attack method that rewrites retrieved documents into pathological tones--specifically "analysis paralysis" or "cognitive haste"--without altering underlying facts or using explicit triggers. To quantify these shifts, we develop the Reasoning Style Vector (RSV), a metric tracking Verification depth, Self-confidence, and Attention focus. Experiments on HotpotQA and FEVER using ReAct, Reflection, and Tree of Thoughts (ToT) architectures reveal that GSI significantly degrades performance. It increases reasoning steps by up to 4.4 times or induces premature errors, successfully bypassing state-of-the-art content filters. Finally, we propose RSP-M, a lightweight runtime monitor that calculates RSV metrics in real-time and triggers alerts when values exceed safety thresholds. Our work demonstrates that reasoning style is a distinct, exploitable vulnerability, necessitating process-level defenses beyond static content analysis.