MMLDSum-LLM: Multimodal Long-Document Summarization with Visual-Alignment and Keyword-Aware

Multimodal long documents are core carriers of professional knowledge, where critical evidence is sparsely distributed across paragraphs and modalities. This easily causes key information omission and cross-modal hallucinations in summarization by multimodal LLMs. These issues stem from attention drift in long-range dependency modeling and gaps in inter-modal alignment. To address this, we introduce MMLDSum-Bench, a high-quality benchmark for multimodal long-document summarization, covering multiple domains, context-length scales, and visual-textual modality distributions. We further propose MMLDSum-LLM, a reproducible two-stage training framework that combines supervised fine-tuning with visual-alignment weighted loss and keyword-aware weighted loss, followed by GRPO with a multi-objective reward (keyword coverage, image-text alignment, ROUGE, and length control). Extensive experiments on MMLDSum-Bench, comparing against leading closed-source and open-source multimodal models under a unified evaluation protocol - including LLM-as-a-judge scoring, atomic-claim precision/recall, image-text alignment (ITA), and ROUGE - demonstrate that our approach significantly improves key-information coverage and cross-modal consistency.

Learning from Prompt itself: the Hierarchical Attribution Prompt Optimization

Optimization is fundamental across numerous disciplines, typically following an iterative process of refining an initial solution to enhance performance. This principle is equally critical in prompt engineering, where designing effective prompts for large language models constitutes a complex optimization challenge. A structured optimization approach requires automated or semi-automated procedures to develop improved prompts, thereby reducing manual effort, improving performance, and yielding an interpretable process. However, current prompt optimization methods often induce prompt drift, where new prompts fix prior failures but impair performance on previously successful tasks. Additionally, generating prompts from scratch can compromise interpretability. To address these limitations, this study proposes the Hierarchical Attribution Prompt Optimization (HAPO) framework, which introduces three innovations: (1) a dynamic attribution mechanism targeting error patterns in training data and prompting history, (2) semantic-unit optimization for editing functional prompt segments, and (3) multimodal-friendly progression supporting both end-to-end LLM and LLM-MLLM workflows. Applied in contexts like single/multi-image QA (e.g., OCRV2) and complex task analysis (e.g., BBH), HAPO demonstrates enhanced optimization efficiency, outperforming comparable automated prompt optimization methods and establishing an extensible paradigm for scalable prompt engineering.