ProWorld: Progress-Aware Hyperbolic World Models for Long-Horizon Visual Goal Reaching

JEPA-style visual world models offer an effective paradigm for visual goal planning by predicting future latent representations. Existing methods typically learn local transition consistency through next-step representation prediction. However, in long-horizon tasks, accurate local prediction alone need not ensure sustained progress toward the goal. First, multi-step rollouts can remain locally plausible while drifting away from goal-relevant trajectories. Second, locally similar future states can correspond to substantially different long-term progress, making them difficult to distinguish in a latent space optimized mainly for local consistency. To address these challenges, we introduce goal-conditioned progress order, a relative ordering of states according to how they advance toward a given goal. This order exhibits an asymmetric, coarse-to-fine structure: early states retain broader future possibilities, while later states concentrate on more specific goal-relevant regions. Such a structure is well suited to hyperbolic geometry. Motivated by this observation, we propose ProWorld, a progress-aware hyperbolic visual world model. ProWorld leverages goal-conditioned progress order to organize visual latent-space dynamics, maintains directional progress within trajectories via hyperbolic entailment learning, and mitigates progress ambiguity among locally similar future states via hyperbolic future discrimination. Furthermore, we design a progress-aware planning objective that scores candidate rollouts by jointly considering proximity to the goal and sustained progress across intermediate states. Experiments on four visual goal-reaching tasks demonstrate that ProWorld achieves an average absolute success-rate gain of 9.67 over LeWM. The code will be released after the paper is accepted.

Dynamic Trust-Aware Sparse Communication Topology for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Consensus

Large language model-driven multi-agent systems enhance the reliability of complex reasoning tasks through multi-round deliberation, role specialization, and cross-validation. However, existing multi-agent debate and collaboration frameworks typically adopt fully connected communication, causing the number of messages, token costs, and end-to-end latency to grow approximately quadratically with the number of agents; although fixed sparse topologies reduce overhead, they cannot adapt communication relationships to different task instances or intermediate reasoning states, making them prone either to preserving low-value interactions or to losing critical error-correction information. To address this problem, this paper proposes DySCo (Dynamic Sparse Consensus), a dynamic trust-aware sparse consensus mechanism. In each round of reasoning, DySCo estimates the value of communication edges based on agent reliability, answer divergence, and task relevance, and selects a small number of high-value edges for message exchange under budget constraints; it then aggregates the answers of different agents through dynamic trust weights and terminates the discussion early once consensus stabilizes. This mechanism replaces universal broadcasting with on-demand communication, thereby reducing communication overhead while preserving essential cross-validation information. We further present analyses of communication complexity and consensus stability, and evaluate the performance of DySCo on mathematical reasoning, logical reasoning, and factual question-answering tasks.