From Pixels to Concepts: Growing Rich 3D Semantic Scene Graph Forests utilizing Foundation Models

Operating in complex real-world environments requires robots to understand their surroundings on a functional semantic level. This demands a detailed multi-layer world model capturing the complex relations of its surroundings. Hierarchical 3D scene graphs address this challenge by integrating geometric, semantic, and relational data within a unified spatial framework. However, current 3D scene graph approaches often restrict themselves to rigid structures of pre-determined relationship classes, mostly neglecting important semantic connections, like causal connections or environmental contexts. This paper explores the potential of foundation models to build forests of 3D scene graphs with open semantic relationships to improve scene understanding and robotic task execution. We propose a method where instance-specific concept-nodes and relationships are first identified by a VLM and extended upon by a LLM, inferring broader, more abstract concept-nodes and relationships through reasoning. These object-nodes, concept-nodes, and relationships are then assembled into a forest of hierarchical 3D scene graphs, enhanced with concept-nodes to represent abstract concepts. Evaluations were conducted on the uHumans2 and ScanNet indoor dataset, validating the accuracy and relevance of the generated relationships. Downstream suitability of scene-graph forests for robotics applications is demonstrated in an open-vocabulary object-retrieval task utilizing both ScanNet data and a real-world indoor deployment using a Boston Dynamics Spot. This paper leverages foundation models to create more expressive, semantically deep 3D hierarchical scene graphs and demonstrates their potential to advance semantic and environmental understanding in robotics.

MOSAIC: Modular Scalable Autonomy for Intelligent Coordination of Heterogeneous Robotic Teams

Mobile robots have become indispensable for exploring hostile environments, such as in space or disaster relief scenarios, but often remain limited to teleoperation by a human operator. This restricts the deployment scale and requires near-continuous low-latency communication between the operator and the robot. We present MOSAIC: a scalable autonomy framework for multi-robot scientific exploration using a unified mission abstraction based on Points of Interest (POIs) and multiple layers of autonomy, enabling supervision by a single operator. The framework dynamically allocates exploration and measurement tasks based on each robot's capabilities, leveraging team-level redundancy and specialization to enable continuous operation. We validated the framework in a space-analog field experiment emulating a lunar prospecting scenario, involving a heterogeneous team of five robots and a single operator. Despite the complete failure of one robot during the mission, the team completed 82.3% of assigned tasks at an Autonomy Ratio of 86%, while the operator workload remained at only 78.2%. These results demonstrate that the proposed framework enables robust, scalable multi-robot scientific exploration with limited operator intervention. We further derive practical lessons learned in robot interoperability, networking architecture, team composition, and operator workload management to inform future multi-robot exploration missions.

A Practical Framework of Key Performance Indicators for Multi-Robot Lunar and Planetary Field Tests

Robotic prospecting for critical resources on the Moon, such as ilmenite, rare earth elements, and water ice, requires robust exploration methods given the diverse terrain and harsh environmental conditions. Although numerous analog field trials address these goals, comparing their results remains challenging because of differences in robot platforms and experimental setups. These missions typically assess performance using selected, scenario-specific engineering metrics that fail to establish a clear link between field performance and science-driven objectives. In this paper, we address this gap by deriving a structured framework of KPI from three realistic multi-robot lunar scenarios reflecting scientific objectives and operational constraints. Our framework emphasizes scenario-dependent priorities in efficiency, robustness, and precision, and is explicitly designed for practical applicability in field deployments. We validated the framework in a multi-robot field test and found it practical and easy to apply for efficiency- and robustness-related KPI, whereas precision-oriented KPI require reliable ground-truth data that is not always feasible to obtain in outdoor analog environments. Overall, we propose this framework as a common evaluation standard enabling consistent, goal-oriented comparison of multi-robot field trials and supporting systematic development of robotic systems for future planetary exploration.