Interpretable Image-Level Acne Severity Grading via EfficientNet-B0 Transfer Learning and Grad-CAM

Acne vulgaris affects most adolescents and many adults. Accurate severity grading guides treatment, monitoring, and clinical trial endpoints, but manual assessment using the Investigator's Global Assessment or Hayashi criteria is limited by inter-rater variability and inconsistent imaging conditions. We developed a four-class acne severity classifier based on the Hayashi criteria using transfer learning with an ImageNet-pretrained EfficientNet-B0 model. The model was fine-tuned on the public ACNE04 dataset of 2,983 labeled images using AdamW optimization, geometric and photometric augmentation, and checkpoint selection based on validation macro-F1. On a held-out stratified 15 percent test set, the classifier achieved 93.5 percent accuracy and 94.4 percent macro-F1, with per-class F1 scores from 0.92 to 0.97. Eighty-three percent of errors occurred between adjacent grades. Quadratic-weighted Cohen's kappa was 0.956, with a 95 percent confidence interval of 0.935 to 0.973. Bootstrap confidence intervals indicated stable performance. Grad-CAM visualizations from the final convolutional block focused on clinically relevant facial regions, including the forehead, cheeks, and chin. The complete pipeline is provided as functionally equivalent open-source implementations in Python using PyTorch and timm, and in MATLAB R2026a. The software includes a clinician-facing inference interface and a fallback backbone option that supports operation without specialized pretrained-weight packages. These results show that lightweight transfer learning can provide accurate, balanced, and interpretable acne severity grading while offering a reproducible cross-platform reference for future prospective and device-stratified clinical validation.

Just-in-Time Catching Test Generation at Meta

We report on Just-in-Time catching test generation at Meta, designed to prevent bugs in large scale backend systems of hundreds of millions of line of code. Unlike traditional hardening tests, which pass at generation time, catching tests are meant to fail, surfacing bugs before code lands. The primary challenge is to reduce development drag from false positive test failures. Analyzing 22,126 generated tests, we show code-change-aware methods improve candidate catch generation 4x over hardening tests and 20x over coincidentally failing tests. To address false positives, we use rule-based and LLM-based assessors. These assessors reduce human review load by 70%. Inferential statistical analysis showed that human-accepted code changes are assessed to have significantly more false positives, while human-rejected changes have significantly more true positives. We reported 41 candidate catches to engineers; 8 were confirmed to be true positives, 4 of which would have led to serious failures had they remained uncaught. Overall, our results show that Just-in-Time catching is scalable, industrially applicable, and that it prevents serious failures from reaching production.

Compliance Brain Assistant: Conversational Agentic AI for Assisting Compliance Tasks in Enterprise Environments

This paper presents Compliance Brain Assistant (CBA), a conversational, agentic AI assistant designed to boost the efficiency of daily compliance tasks for personnel in enterprise environments. To strike a good balance between response quality and latency, we design a user query router that can intelligently choose between (i) FastTrack mode: to handle simple requests that only need additional relevant context retrieved from knowledge corpora; and (ii) FullAgentic mode: to handle complicated requests that need composite actions and tool invocations to proactively discover context across various compliance artifacts, and/or involving other APIs/models for accommodating requests. A typical example would be to start with a user query, use its description to find a specific entity and then use the entity's information to query other APIs for curating and enriching the final AI response. Our experimental evaluations compared CBA against an out-of-the-box LLM on various real-world privacy/compliance-related queries targeting various personas. We found that CBA substantially improved upon the vanilla LLM's performance on metrics such as average keyword match rate (83.7% vs. 41.7%) and LLM-judge pass rate (82.0% vs. 20.0%). We also compared metrics for the full routing-based design against the `fast-track only` and `full-agentic` modes and found that it had a better average match-rate and pass-rate while keeping the run-time approximately the same. This finding validated our hypothesis that the routing mechanism leads to a good trade-off between the two worlds.