Can AI Guess What You Know? Performance Comparison of Large Language Models for Human Domain Knowledge Estimation From Communication Logs

Employees often struggle to identify ``who knows what,'' leading to organizational productivity losses. We investigate whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can infer individual domain knowledge directly from long-term Slack logs. Analyzing 27,188 messages from 43 users, we evaluated seven models (including Gemini, Claude, and GPT families) by comparing their zero-shot estimates against self-reported skill ratings from 27 participants. Gemini 2.5 Flash achieved the lowest error (MAE 21.13%), while GPT models showed significantly larger discrepancies. Notably, estimation accuracy depended only weakly on message volume, indicating that more text alone does not guarantee better inference. These findings demonstrate the feasibility and current limits of automated expertise mapping, highlighting the need for privacy-preserving deployments and richer, structure-aware representations of human knowledge.

EyeBrain: Left and Right Brain Lateralization Activity Classification Through Pupil Diameter and Fixation Duration

The relationship between brain lateralization and cognitive functions is well-documented. The left hemisphere primarily handles tasks such as language and arithmetic, while the right hemisphere is involved in creative activities like drawing and music perception. Eye-tracking technology has shown the potential to reveal cognitive states by measuring ocular metrics such as pupil diameter and fixation duration. However, the ability to distinguish lateralized brain activity using these ocular metrics remains underexplored. Here, we demonstrate that pupil diameter and fixation duration can effectively classify left and right brain hemisphere activities. We obtained a considerably high classification performance, with an F1 score of 0.894. The results suggest that ocular metrics are robust indicators of lateralized brain activity and can be applied in cognitive monitoring and neurorehabilitation. Our future work expands on this by integrating these methods into real-time applications EyeBrain, potentially broadening their use across various cognitive and neurological domains.

SensPS: Sensing Personal Space Comfortable Distance between Human-Human Using Multimodal Sensors

Personal space, also known as peripersonal space, is crucial in human social interaction, influencing comfort, communication, and social stress. Estimating and respecting personal space is essential for enhancing human-computer interaction (HCI) and smart environments. Personal space preferences vary due to individual traits, cultural background, and contextual factors. Advanced multimodal sensing technologies, including eye-tracking and wristband sensors, offer opportunities to develop adaptive systems that dynamically adjust to user comfort levels. Integrating physiological and behavioral data enables a deeper understanding of spatial interactions. This study develops a sensor-based model to estimate comfortable personal space and identifies key features influencing spatial preferences. Our findings show that multimodal sensors, particularly eye-tracking and physiological wristband data, can effectively predict personal space preferences, with eye-tracking data playing a more significant role. An experimental study involving controlled human interactions demonstrates that a Transformer-based model achieves the highest predictive accuracy (F1 score: 0.87) for estimating personal space. Eye-tracking features, such as gaze point and pupil diameter, emerge as the most significant predictors, while physiological signals from wristband sensors contribute marginally. These results highlight the potential for AI-driven personalization of social space in adaptive environments, suggesting that multimodal sensing can be leveraged to develop intelligent systems that optimize spatial arrangements in workplaces, educational institutions, and public settings. Future work should explore larger datasets, real-world applications, and additional physiological markers to enhance model robustness.

Human-in-the-Loop Annotation for Image-Based Engagement Estimation: Assessing the Impact of Model Reliability on Annotation Accuracy

Human-in-the-loop (HITL) frameworks are increasingly recognized for their potential to improve annotation accuracy in emotion estimation systems by combining machine predictions with human expertise. This study focuses on integrating a high-performing image-based emotion model into a HITL annotation framework to evaluate the collaborative potential of human-machine interaction and identify the psychological and practical factors critical to successful collaboration. Specifically, we investigate how varying model reliability and cognitive framing influence human trust, cognitive load, and annotation behavior in HITL systems. We demonstrate that model reliability and psychological framing significantly impact annotators' trust, engagement, and consistency, offering insights into optimizing HITL frameworks. Through three experimental scenarios with 29 participants--baseline model reliability (S1), fabricated errors (S2), and cognitive bias introduced by negative framing (S3)--we analyzed behavioral and qualitative data. Reliable predictions in S1 yielded high trust and annotation consistency, while unreliable outputs in S2 led to increased critical evaluations but also heightened frustration and response variability. Negative framing in S3 revealed how cognitive bias influenced participants to perceive the model as more relatable and accurate, despite misinformation regarding its reliability. These findings highlight the importance of both reliable machine outputs and psychological factors in shaping effective human-machine collaboration. By leveraging the strengths of both human oversight and automated systems, this study establishes a scalable HITL framework for emotion annotation and lays the foundation for broader applications in adaptive learning and human-computer interaction.

Confidence-Aware Learning Assistant

Not only correctness but also self-confidence play an important role in improving the quality of knowledge. Undesirable situations such as confident incorrect and unconfident correct knowledge prevent learners from revising their knowledge because it is not always easy for them to perceive the situations. To solve this problem, we propose a system that estimates self-confidence while solving multiple-choice questions by eye tracking and gives feedback about which question should be reviewed carefully. We report the results of three studies measuring its effectiveness. (1) On a well-controlled dataset with 10 participants, our approach detected confidence and unconfidence with 81% and 79% average precision. (2) With the help of 20 participants, we observed that correct answer rates of questions were increased by 14% and 17% by giving feedback about correct answers without confidence and incorrect answers with confidence, respectively. (3) We conducted a large-scale data recording in a private school (72 high school students solved 14,302 questions) to investigate effective features and the number of required training samples.