Rethinking Testing for LLM Applications: Characteristics, Challenges, and a Lightweight Interaction Protocol

Applications of Large Language Models~(LLMs) have evolved from simple text generators into complex software systems that integrate retrieval augmentation, tool invocation, and multi-turn interactions. Their inherent non-determinism, dynamism, and context dependence pose fundamental challenges for quality assurance. This paper decomposes LLM applications into a three-layer architecture: \textbf{\textit{System Shell Layer}}, \textbf{\textit{Prompt Orchestration Layer}}, and \textbf{\textit{LLM Inference Core}}. We then assess the applicability of traditional software testing methods in each layer: directly applicable at the shell layer, requiring semantic reinterpretation at the orchestration layer, and necessitating paradigm shifts at the inference core. A comparative analysis of Testing AI methods from the software engineering community and safety analysis techniques from the AI community reveals structural disconnects in testing unit abstraction, evaluation metrics, and lifecycle management. We identify four fundamental differences that underlie 6 core challenges. To address these, we propose four types of collaborative strategies (\emph{Retain}, \emph{Translate}, \emph{Integrate}, and \emph{Runtime}) and explore a closed-loop, trustworthy quality assurance framework that combines pre-deployment validation with runtime monitoring. Based on these strategies, we offer practical guidance and a protocol proposal to support the standardization and tooling of LLM application testing. We propose a protocol \textbf{\textit{Agent Interaction Communication Language}} (AICL) that is used to communicate between AI agents. AICL has the test-oriented features and is easily integrated in the current agent framework.

HKTGNN: Hierarchical Knowledge Transferable Graph Neural Network-based Supply Chain Risk Assessment

The strength of a supply chain is an important measure of a country's or region's technical advancement and overall competitiveness. Establishing supply chain risk assessment models for effective management and mitigation of potential risks has become increasingly crucial. As the number of businesses grows, the important relationships become more complicated and difficult to measure. This emphasizes the need of extracting relevant information from graph data. Previously, academics mostly employed knowledge inference to increase the visibility of links between nodes in the supply chain. However, they have not solved the data hunger problem of single node feature characteristics. We propose a hierarchical knowledge transferable graph neural network-based (HKTGNN) supply chain risk assessment model to address these issues. Our approach is based on current graph embedding methods for assessing corporate investment risk assessment. We embed the supply chain network corresponding to individual goods in the supply chain using the graph embedding module, resulting in a directed homogeneous graph with just product nodes. This reduces the complicated supply chain network into a basic product network. It addresses difficulties using the domain difference knowledge transferable module based on centrality, which is presented by the premise that supply chain feature characteristics may be biased in the actual world. Meanwhile, the feature complement and message passing will alleviate the data hunger problem, which is driven by domain differences. Our model outperforms in experiments on a real-world supply chain dataset. We will give an equation to prove that our comparative experiment is both effective and fair.