Learning-Based Motion Planning for Dynamic Environments: From Foundational Algorithms to Emerging Paradigms

Motion planning in dynamic environments is a fundamental problem in robotics, aiming to generate safe and efficient paths, trajectories, or control actions in the presence of moving obstacles, uncertain predictions, and multi-agent interactions. It has broad applications in autonomous driving, service robotics, warehouse logistics, human-robot collaboration, crowd navigation, and multi-robot systems. This survey reviews representative works published primarily between 2015 and 2025, with a particular focus on how recent learning-based advances extend, complement, or interact with classical planning foundations. We first revisit classical planning methods as algorithmic foundations and reference frameworks for learning-based extensions. We then propose a role-of-learning taxonomy that categorizes existing methods according to how learning participates in the planning pipeline, including direct policy learning, learning-augmented classical planning, hybrid planning, and training enhancement methods. For each category, we summarize the main problem settings, representative algorithms, key ideas, integration mechanisms, strengths, and limitations. We further analyze how observation representations, prediction uncertainty, interaction modeling, planner integration, safety constraints, and training strategies shape learning-based motion planning in dynamic environments. Finally, we discuss open challenges and future directions, including sim-to-real gap, safe and certifiable planning, dense crowd navigation, perception-planning coupling, and embodied AI.

Coverage Path Planning: Classical Foundations, Recent Advances, and Future Directions

Coverage path planning (CPP) is a fundamental problem in robot motion planning, whose aim is to produce robot trajectories that provide complete coverage of target workspaces while minimizing task-specific objectives such as path length, overlap, number of turns, and energy consumption. CPP has widespread applications in cleaning, inspection, mapping, agriculture, manufacturing, surveillance, demining, and environmental monitoring. Although classical CPP has been extensively studied, recent advances have extended CPP beyond single-robot settings to multi-robot systems, complex 3D environments, constrained platforms, learning-based coverage planning, and visual coverage tasks. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of 125 representative works published primarily between 2015 and 2026, while presenting the evolution of recent developments in light of the classical CPP methods published before 2015. The CPP methods are organized into six main categories: single-robot CPP, multi-robot CPP, 3D CPP, constrained CPP, learning-based CPP, and visual CPP. For each category, the review summarizes the main planning formulations, representative algorithms, strengths, and limitations. In addition, the review analyzes how environmental knowledge, workspace geometry, robot constraints, sensing objectives, and coordination requirements shape the CPP problem. The survey further discusses open challenges in scalable online planning, multi-robot coordination, 3D and visual coverage, unified platform-constrained and resource-aware coverage, and learning-enhanced coverage. Thus, the survey provides a structured overview of recent CPP developments and future research directions.

Motion Planning in Dynamic Environments: A Survey from Classical to Modern Methods

Motion planning in dynamic environments requires robots to continuously adapt their paths in response to environmental changes for safe and uninterrupted navigation. While many surveys have reviewed planning in static settings, systematic reviews focused on dynamic environments remain limited. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of 138 works, primarily published between 2015 and 2025, spanning both classical and learning-based approaches. The motion planning methods are grouped into five categories based on the concepts of sampling, graph search, model predictive control, learning, and additional classical local planning approaches, including velocity obstacles, potential fields and dynamic windows. The learning techniques include supervised learning and reinforcement learning. We also discuss the role of dynamic perception in motion planning, covering techniques for detecting and modeling moving obstacles using cameras, LiDAR, and event-based sensors. The survey analyzes the principles, strengths, and limitations of each method, with particular attention to challenges unique to dynamic environments, such as prediction uncertainty, human-robot interaction, and the freezing robot problem. The survey provides researchers with a structured understanding of motion planning methods in dynamic environments.