Locomotion Variability and User Experience in Smart Wheelchair Human-Robot Interaction

Human movement is inherently variable, with variability structured according to task relevance: movements are typically more consistent at task-critical points and more flexible elsewhere. In human-robot interaction (HRI), however, model-based assistance strategies commonly assume deterministic human behavior and suppress such variability, potentially altering how interactions are experienced and lowering sense of agency. While movement variability is increasingly recognized as functionally meaningful, its deliberate preservation in assisted interaction, and its consequences for user experience, remain underexplored. In this paper, we empirically investigate how different assistance strategies shape human movement variability, task performance, and subjective interaction experience in a shared control setting. We introduce an autonomy-supportive shared control strategy that preserves users' natural movement structure. This approach is evaluated in a user study in which participants push an intelligent powered wheelchair under three conditions: no assistance, conventional variability-reducing assistance, and variability-preserving assistance. While task-relevant performance remained comparable across assisted modes, preserving natural movement variability led to more favorable interaction experiences. In particular, participants reported significantly higher perceived agency compared to conventional assistance and highest perceived usefulness. These findings suggest that variability-aware assistance can support both performance and user autonomy in physical human-robot collaboration. More broadly, the results highlight the importance of designing assistive robotic systems that respect the embodied structure of human movement rather than treating variability as noise to be neglected or eliminated.

Beyond Task Performance: Human Experience in Human-Robot Collaboration

Human interaction experience plays a crucial role in the effectiveness of human-machine collaboration, especially as interactions in future systems progress towards tighter physical and functional integration. While automation design has been shown to impact task performance, its influence on human experience metrics such as flow, sense of agency (SoA), and embodiment remains underexplored. This study investigates how variations in automation design affect these psychological experience measures and examines correlations between subjective experience and physiological indicators. A user study was conducted in a simulated wood workshop, where participants collaborated with a lightweight robot under four automation levels. The results of the study indicate that medium automation levels enhance flow, SoA and embodiment, striking a balance between support and user autonomy. In contrast, higher automation, despite optimizing task performance, diminishes perceived flow and agency. Furthermore, we observed that grip force might be considered as a real-time proxy of SoA, while correlations with heart rate variability were inconclusive. The findings underscore the necessity for automation strategies that integrate human- centric metrics, aiming to optimize both performance and user experience in collaborative robotic systems

Adaptive Optimal Trajectory Tracking Control Applied to a Large-Scale Ball-on-Plate System

While many theoretical works concerning Adaptive Dynamic Programming (ADP) have been proposed, application results are scarce. Therefore, we design an ADP-based optimal trajectory tracking controller and apply it to a large-scale ball-on-plate system. Our proposed method incorporates an approximated reference trajectory instead of using setpoint tracking and allows to automatically compensate for constant offset terms. Due to the off-policy characteristics of the algorithm, the method requires only a small amount of measured data to train the controller. Our experimental results show that this tracking mechanism significantly reduces the control cost compared to setpoint controllers. Furthermore, a comparison with a model-based optimal controller highlights the benefits of our model-free data-based ADP tracking controller, where no system model and manual tuning are required but the controller is tuned automatically using measured data.