Beyond task performance: Decoding bioacoustic embeddings with speech features

Pretrained audio embeddings are standard in bioacoustics, yet little is known about which acoustic features these models encode, nor which are useful for a given task. This hinders transparency and limits extension to rare species or data-scarce domains. Here we reveal which speech-like features are encoded in bioacoustic representations. Using the 88~eGeMAPS features across six taxonomic groups, we apply linear and nonlinear regression probes to quantify which acoustic properties each model captures. Results confirm a ``no free lunch'' pattern: no single model captures the full feature space. A concatenated embedding achieves the highest performance, suggesting complementary acoustic space coverage across models. Loudness features are best encoded ($R^2 = 0.76$) while F0 is hardest to recover ($R^2 = 0.33$). By cross-referencing recoverability with per-species feature salience (NMI), we derive data-driven model selection guidance for bioacoustics.

Multi-layer attentive probing improves transfer of audio representations for bioacoustics

Probing heads map the representations learned from audio by a machine learning model to downstream task labels and are a key component in evaluating representation learning. Most bioacoustic benchmarks use a fixed, low-capacity probe, such as a linear layer on the final encoder layer. While this standardization enables model comparisons, it may bias results by overlooking the interaction between encoder features and probe design. In this work, we systematically study different probing strategies across two bioacoustic benchmarks, BEANs and BirdSet. We evaluate last- and multi-layer probing, across linear and attention probes. We show that larger probe heads that leverage time information have superior performance. Our results suggest that current benchmarks may misrepresent encoder quality when relying on a last-layer probing setup. Multi-layer probing improves downstream task performance across all tested models, while attention probing has superior performance to linear probing for transformer models.

Biodenoising: animal vocalization denoising without access to clean data

Animal vocalization denoising is a task similar to human speech enhancement, a well-studied field of research. In contrast to the latter, it is applied to a higher diversity of sound production mechanisms and recording environments, and this higher diversity is a challenge for existing models. Adding to the challenge and in contrast to speech, we lack large and diverse datasets comprising clean vocalizations. As a solution we use as training data pseudo-clean targets, i.e. pre-denoised vocalizations, and segments of background noise without a vocalization. We propose a train set derived from bioacoustics datasets and repositories representing diverse species, acoustic environments, geographic regions. Additionally, we introduce a non-overlapping benchmark set comprising clean vocalizations from different taxa and noise samples. We show that that denoising models (demucs, CleanUNet) trained on pseudo-clean targets obtained with speech enhancement models achieve competitive results on the benchmarking set. We publish data, code, libraries, and demos https://mariusmiron.com/research/biodenoising.