When Vision Becomes Text: Visual Token Pruning via Cross-Modal Residual Guidance in VLMs

Abundant visual information strengthens vision-language model (VLM) perception, yet massive visual tokens raise inference costs. Existing visual token pruning methods rely on similarity-based guidance, which exploits pairwise text-vision and vision-vision token correlations for compression. However, such methods only capture local layer-level signals and overlook the whole inference process in VLM. In this paper, we revisit VLM inference and present a new efficient guidance scheme that complements similarity-based guidance. In particular, we identify a key observation: as LLM layers deepen, text tokens continuously aggregate visual information via self-attention and progressively absorb partial visual content into textual representations. To quantify this phenomenon, we propose Cross Modal Absorption (CMA) from a geometric representation perspective to measure how much visual information is absorbed by text, revealing that more visual tokens in deeper layers can be approximately explained by the text subspace. We accordingly propose Cross Modal Residual (CMR). It projects visual tokens onto the text subspace via Tikhonov regularized least squares and exploits reconstruction residuals to quantify visual information that cannot be explained by text. Finally, based on CMR, we present SIEVE, a training-free visual token compression method that combines CMR, text-attention relevance, and residual-space diversity to retain task-relevant and complementary tokens. Experiments on diverse VLM architectures verify the effectiveness of SIEVE. For instance, on LLaVA-NeXT-7B, SIEVE keeps only $11.1\%$ of visual tokens while preserving $97.5\%$ of the original average performance, achieving $3.62\times$ prefill speedup, $2.49\times$ end-to-end speedup, and a $6.02\times$ KV-cache reduction.

Causal Reward Adjustment: Mitigating Reward Hacking in External Reasoning via Backdoor Correction

External reasoning systems combine language models with process reward models (PRMs) to select high-quality reasoning paths for complex tasks such as mathematical problem solving. However, these systems are prone to reward hacking, where high-scoring but logically incorrect paths are assigned high scores by the PRMs, leading to incorrect answers. From a causal inference perspective, we attribute this phenomenon primarily to the presence of confounding semantic features. To address it, we propose Causal Reward Adjustment (CRA), a method that mitigates reward hacking by estimating the true reward of a reasoning path. CRA trains sparse autoencoders on the PRM's internal activations to recover interpretable features, then corrects confounding by using backdoor adjustment. Experiments on math solving datasets demonstrate that CRA mitigates reward hacking and improves final accuracy, without modifying the policy model or retraining PRM.