Abstract:We study the problem of inserting new furniture into indoor scene images. Under masked single-view 2D image-plane conditioning, however, the physical scale of the inserted furniture relative to the scene cannot be uniquely determined, making physically grounded furniture placement underdetermined from image evidence alone. We therefore reformulate the task as a combination of 3D pose inference and geometry-guided image generation, where estimating a geometrically plausible 3D placement is essential for reliable synthesis. To this end, we propose a two-stage framework. For 3D placement, we introduce GOPI, a generation-oriented 3D pose inference framework that addresses the underdetermined nature of single-view furniture insertion through data-driven iterative inference, producing geometrically plausible object placements. For image generation, we develop a geometry-guided conditioning strategy that projects the inferred 3D pose into the image plane as a pixel-aligned constraint, enforcing consistency between the synthesized image and the underlying 3D geometry. Experimental results validate the proposed framework from both 3D pose estimation and image synthesis perspectives. For 3D placement, GOPI produces poses with stronger geometric feasibility and better consistency with reference layouts than direct regression and vanilla baselines. For image synthesis, our method preserves alignment with the projected 3D geometry across different furniture scales, showing stable projection-generation alignment across the tested furniture scales.
Abstract:Vision--Language--Action (VLA) policies have shown strong progress in mapping language instructions and visual observations to robotic actions, yet their reliability degrades in cluttered scenes with distractors. By analyzing failure cases, we find that many errors do not arise from infeasible motions, but from instance-level grounding failures: the policy often produces a plausible grasp trajectory that lands slightly off-target or even on the wrong object instance. To address this issue, we propose TAG (Target-Agnostic Guidance), a simple inference-time guidance mechanism that explicitly reduces distractor- and appearance-induced bias in VLA policies. Inspired by classifier-free guidance (CFG), TAG contrasts policy predictions under the original observation and an object-erased observation, and uses their difference as a residual steering signal that strengthens the influence of object evidence in the decision process. TAG does not require modifying the policy architecture and can be integrated with existing VLA policies with minimal training and inference changes. We evaluate TAG on standard manipulation benchmarks, including LIBERO, LIBERO-Plus, and VLABench, where it consistently improves robustness under clutter and reduces near-miss and wrong-object executions.