DNS-GT: A Graph-based Transformer Approach to Learn Embeddings of Domain Names from DNS Queries

Network intrusion detection systems play a crucial role in the security strategy employed by organisations to detect and prevent cyberattacks. Such systems usually combine pattern detection signatures with anomaly detection techniques powered by machine learning methods. However, the commonly proposed machine learning methods present drawbacks such as over-reliance on labeled data and limited generalization capabilities. To address these issues, embedding-based methods have been introduced to learn representations from network data, such as DNS traffic, mainly due to its large availability, that generalise effectively to many downstream tasks. However, current approaches do not properly consider contextual information among DNS queries. In this paper, we tackle this issue by proposing DNS-GT, a novel Transformer-based model that learns embeddings for domain names from sequences of DNS queries. The model is first pre-trained in a self-supervised fashion in order to learn the general behavior of DNS activity. Then, it can be finetuned on specific downstream tasks, exploiting interactions with other relevant queries in a given sequence. Our experiments with real-world DNS data showcase the ability of our method to learn effective domain name representations. A quantitative evaluation on domain name classification and botnet detection tasks shows that our approach achieves better results compared to relevant baselines, creating opportunities for further exploration of large-scale language models for intrusion detection systems. Our code is available at: https://github.com/m-altieri/DNS-GT.

Liability regimes in the age of AI: a use-case driven analysis of the burden of proof

New emerging technologies powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI) have the potential to disruptively transform our societies for the better. In particular, data-driven learning approaches (i.e., Machine Learning (ML)) have been a true revolution in the advancement of multiple technologies in various application domains. But at the same time there is growing concerns about certain intrinsic characteristics of these methodologies that carry potential risks to both safety and fundamental rights. Although there are mechanisms in the adoption process to minimize these risks (e.g., safety regulations), these do not exclude the possibility of harm occurring, and if this happens, victims should be able to seek compensation. Liability regimes will therefore play a key role in ensuring basic protection for victims using or interacting with these systems. However, the same characteristics that make AI systems inherently risky, such as lack of causality, opacity, unpredictability or their self and continuous learning capabilities, lead to considerable difficulties when it comes to proving causation. This paper presents three case studies, as well as the methodology to reach them, that illustrate these difficulties. Specifically, we address the cases of cleaning robots, delivery drones and robots in education. The outcome of the proposed analysis suggests the need to revise liability regimes to alleviate the burden of proof on victims in cases involving AI technologies.