Abstract:While Large Language Model (LLM) based Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) enables seamless multilingual use, models often misidentify the output language, compromising transcription fidelity and downstream application quality. To preserve flexibility and code-switching capabilities, we propose a soft prompting approach that hints at potential spoken languages without strictly constraining the output. We formally define this challenge as a lack of language adherence, introduce a novel metric to quantify violations, and evaluate three mitigation strategies: (1) zero-shot prompting for robust guidance under uncertainty, (2) supervised fine-tuning (SFT) to improve prompt adherence, and (3) Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning to enforce adherence during decoding. We present a comparative analysis of these methods across multiple languages, evaluating effectiveness in reducing the language violation while maintaining overall ASR performance. Finally, we discuss trade-offs to guide strategy selection under various compute constraints.
Abstract:Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems can suffer from poor recall for various reasons, such as noisy audio, lack of sufficient training data, etc. Previous work has shown that recall can be improved by retrieving rewrite candidates from a large database of likely, contextually-relevant alternatives to the hypothesis text using nearest-neighbors search over embeddings of the ASR hypothesis text to correct and candidate corrections. However, ASR-hypothesis-based retrieval can yield poor precision if the textual hypotheses are too phonetically dissimilar to the transcript truth. In this paper, we eliminate the hypothesis-audio mismatch problem by querying the correction database directly using embeddings derived from the utterance audio; the embeddings of the utterance audio and candidate corrections are produced by multimodal speech-text embedding networks trained to place the embedding of the audio of an utterance and the embedding of its corresponding textual transcript close together. After locating an appropriate correction candidate using nearest-neighbor search, we score the candidate with its speech-text embedding distance before adding the candidate to the original n-best list. We show a relative word error rate (WER) reduction of 6% on utterances whose transcripts appear in the candidate set, without increasing WER on general utterances.