Alert button
Picture for Noah D. Brenowitz

Noah D. Brenowitz

Alert button

ACE: A fast, skillful learned global atmospheric model for climate prediction

Oct 03, 2023
Oliver Watt-Meyer, Gideon Dresdner, Jeremy McGibbon, Spencer K. Clark, Brian Henn, James Duncan, Noah D. Brenowitz, Karthik Kashinath, Michael S. Pritchard, Boris Bonev, Matthew E. Peters, Christopher S. Bretherton

Existing ML-based atmospheric models are not suitable for climate prediction, which requires long-term stability and physical consistency. We present ACE (AI2 Climate Emulator), a 200M-parameter, autoregressive machine learning emulator of an existing comprehensive 100-km resolution global atmospheric model. The formulation of ACE allows evaluation of physical laws such as the conservation of mass and moisture. The emulator is stable for 10 years, nearly conserves column moisture without explicit constraints and faithfully reproduces the reference model's climate, outperforming a challenging baseline on over 80% of tracked variables. ACE requires nearly 100x less wall clock time and is 100x more energy efficient than the reference model using typically available resources.

Viaarxiv icon

ClimSim: An open large-scale dataset for training high-resolution physics emulators in hybrid multi-scale climate simulators

Jun 16, 2023
Sungduk Yu, Walter M. Hannah, Liran Peng, Mohamed Aziz Bhouri, Ritwik Gupta, Jerry Lin, Björn Lütjens, Justus C. Will, Tom Beucler, Bryce E. Harrop, Benjamin R. Hillman, Andrea M. Jenney, Savannah L. Ferretti, Nana Liu, Anima Anandkumar, Noah D. Brenowitz, Veronika Eyring, Pierre Gentine, Stephan Mandt, Jaideep Pathak, Carl Vondrick, Rose Yu, Laure Zanna, Ryan P. Abernathey, Fiaz Ahmed, David C. Bader, Pierre Baldi, Elizabeth A. Barnes, Gunnar Behrens, Christopher S. Bretherton, Julius J. M. Busecke, Peter M. Caldwell, Wayne Chuang, Yilun Han, Yu Huang, Fernando Iglesias-Suarez, Sanket Jantre, Karthik Kashinath, Marat Khairoutdinov, Thorsten Kurth, Nicholas J. Lutsko, Po-Lun Ma, Griffin Mooers, J. David Neelin, David A. Randall, Sara Shamekh, Akshay Subramaniam, Mark A. Taylor, Nathan M. Urban, Janni Yuval, Guang J. Zhang, Tian Zheng, Michael S. Pritchard

Figure 1 for ClimSim: An open large-scale dataset for training high-resolution physics emulators in hybrid multi-scale climate simulators
Figure 2 for ClimSim: An open large-scale dataset for training high-resolution physics emulators in hybrid multi-scale climate simulators
Figure 3 for ClimSim: An open large-scale dataset for training high-resolution physics emulators in hybrid multi-scale climate simulators
Figure 4 for ClimSim: An open large-scale dataset for training high-resolution physics emulators in hybrid multi-scale climate simulators

Modern climate projections lack adequate spatial and temporal resolution due to computational constraints. A consequence is inaccurate and imprecise prediction of critical processes such as storms. Hybrid methods that combine physics with machine learning (ML) have introduced a new generation of higher fidelity climate simulators that can sidestep Moore's Law by outsourcing compute-hungry, short, high-resolution simulations to ML emulators. However, this hybrid ML-physics simulation approach requires domain-specific treatment and has been inaccessible to ML experts because of lack of training data and relevant, easy-to-use workflows. We present ClimSim, the largest-ever dataset designed for hybrid ML-physics research. It comprises multi-scale climate simulations, developed by a consortium of climate scientists and ML researchers. It consists of 5.7 billion pairs of multivariate input and output vectors that isolate the influence of locally-nested, high-resolution, high-fidelity physics on a host climate simulator's macro-scale physical state. The dataset is global in coverage, spans multiple years at high sampling frequency, and is designed such that resulting emulators are compatible with downstream coupling into operational climate simulators. We implement a range of deterministic and stochastic regression baselines to highlight the ML challenges and their scoring. The data (https://huggingface.co/datasets/LEAP/ClimSim_high-res) and code (https://leap-stc.github.io/ClimSim) are released openly to support the development of hybrid ML-physics and high-fidelity climate simulations for the benefit of science and society.

Viaarxiv icon

Machine-learned climate model corrections from a global storm-resolving model

Nov 21, 2022
Anna Kwa, Spencer K. Clark, Brian Henn, Noah D. Brenowitz, Jeremy McGibbon, W. Andre Perkins, Oliver Watt-Meyer, Lucas Harris, Christopher S. Bretherton

Figure 1 for Machine-learned climate model corrections from a global storm-resolving model
Figure 2 for Machine-learned climate model corrections from a global storm-resolving model
Figure 3 for Machine-learned climate model corrections from a global storm-resolving model
Figure 4 for Machine-learned climate model corrections from a global storm-resolving model

Due to computational constraints, running global climate models (GCMs) for many years requires a lower spatial grid resolution (${\gtrsim}50$ km) than is optimal for accurately resolving important physical processes. Such processes are approximated in GCMs via subgrid parameterizations, which contribute significantly to the uncertainty in GCM predictions. One approach to improving the accuracy of a coarse-grid global climate model is to add machine-learned state-dependent corrections at each simulation timestep, such that the climate model evolves more like a high-resolution global storm-resolving model (GSRM). We train neural networks to learn the state-dependent temperature, humidity, and radiative flux corrections needed to nudge a 200 km coarse-grid climate model to the evolution of a 3~km fine-grid GSRM. When these corrective ML models are coupled to a year-long coarse-grid climate simulation, the time-mean spatial pattern errors are reduced by 6-25% for land surface temperature and 9-25% for land surface precipitation with respect to a no-ML baseline simulation. The ML-corrected simulations develop other biases in climate and circulation that differ from, but have comparable amplitude to, the baseline simulation.

Viaarxiv icon