Get our free extension to see links to code for papers anywhere online!

Chrome logo  Add to Chrome

Firefox logo Add to Firefox
Picture for Najib J. Majaj

Najib J. Majaj
Alert button

SATBench: Benchmarking the speed-accuracy tradeoff in object recognition by humans and dynamic neural networks


Jun 16, 2022
Ajay Subramanian, Sara Price, Omkar Kumbhar, Elena Sizikova, Najib J. Majaj, Denis G. Pelli

Add code
Alert button

Figure 1 for SATBench: Benchmarking the speed-accuracy tradeoff in object recognition by humans and dynamic neural networks
Figure 2 for SATBench: Benchmarking the speed-accuracy tradeoff in object recognition by humans and dynamic neural networks
Figure 3 for SATBench: Benchmarking the speed-accuracy tradeoff in object recognition by humans and dynamic neural networks
Figure 4 for SATBench: Benchmarking the speed-accuracy tradeoff in object recognition by humans and dynamic neural networks
* 19 pages, 12 figures. Under Review at NeurIPS Datasets and Benchmarks Track 2022 
   Access Paper or Ask Questions
  • Share via Twitter
  • Share via Facebook
  • Share via LinkedIn
  • Share via Whatsapp
  • Share via Messenger
  • Share via Email

Using Human Psychophysics to Evaluate Generalization in Scene Text Recognition Models


Jun 30, 2020
Sahar Siddiqui, Elena Sizikova, Gemma Roig, Najib J. Majaj, Denis G. Pelli

Add code
Alert button

Figure 1 for Using Human Psychophysics to Evaluate Generalization in Scene Text Recognition Models
Figure 2 for Using Human Psychophysics to Evaluate Generalization in Scene Text Recognition Models
Figure 3 for Using Human Psychophysics to Evaluate Generalization in Scene Text Recognition Models
Figure 4 for Using Human Psychophysics to Evaluate Generalization in Scene Text Recognition Models

   Access Paper or Ask Questions
  • Share via Twitter
  • Share via Facebook
  • Share via LinkedIn
  • Share via Whatsapp
  • Share via Messenger
  • Share via Email

Brain-Like Object Recognition with High-Performing Shallow Recurrent ANNs


Oct 28, 2019
Jonas Kubilius, Martin Schrimpf, Kohitij Kar, Ha Hong, Najib J. Majaj, Rishi Rajalingham, Elias B. Issa, Pouya Bashivan, Jonathan Prescott-Roy, Kailyn Schmidt, Aran Nayebi, Daniel Bear, Daniel L. K. Yamins, James J. DiCarlo

Add code
Alert button

Figure 1 for Brain-Like Object Recognition with High-Performing Shallow Recurrent ANNs
Figure 2 for Brain-Like Object Recognition with High-Performing Shallow Recurrent ANNs
Figure 3 for Brain-Like Object Recognition with High-Performing Shallow Recurrent ANNs
Figure 4 for Brain-Like Object Recognition with High-Performing Shallow Recurrent ANNs
* NeurIPS 2019 (Oral). Code available at https://github.com/dicarlolab/neurips2019 
   Access Paper or Ask Questions
  • Share via Twitter
  • Share via Facebook
  • Share via LinkedIn
  • Share via Whatsapp
  • Share via Messenger
  • Share via Email

Deep Neural Networks Rival the Representation of Primate IT Cortex for Core Visual Object Recognition


Jun 12, 2014
Charles F. Cadieu, Ha Hong, Daniel L. K. Yamins, Nicolas Pinto, Diego Ardila, Ethan A. Solomon, Najib J. Majaj, James J. DiCarlo

Add code
Alert button

Figure 1 for Deep Neural Networks Rival the Representation of Primate IT Cortex for Core Visual Object Recognition
Figure 2 for Deep Neural Networks Rival the Representation of Primate IT Cortex for Core Visual Object Recognition
Figure 3 for Deep Neural Networks Rival the Representation of Primate IT Cortex for Core Visual Object Recognition
Figure 4 for Deep Neural Networks Rival the Representation of Primate IT Cortex for Core Visual Object Recognition
* 35 pages, 12 figures, extends and expands upon arXiv:1301.3530 
   Access Paper or Ask Questions
  • Share via Twitter
  • Share via Facebook
  • Share via LinkedIn
  • Share via Whatsapp
  • Share via Messenger
  • Share via Email

The Neural Representation Benchmark and its Evaluation on Brain and Machine


Jan 25, 2013
Charles F. Cadieu, Ha Hong, Dan Yamins, Nicolas Pinto, Najib J. Majaj, James J. DiCarlo

Add code
Alert button

Figure 1 for The Neural Representation Benchmark and its Evaluation on Brain and Machine
Figure 2 for The Neural Representation Benchmark and its Evaluation on Brain and Machine
Figure 3 for The Neural Representation Benchmark and its Evaluation on Brain and Machine
Figure 4 for The Neural Representation Benchmark and its Evaluation on Brain and Machine
* The v1 version contained incorrectly computed kernel analysis curves and KA-AUC values for V4, IT, and the HT-L3 models. They have been corrected in this version 
   Access Paper or Ask Questions
  • Share via Twitter
  • Share via Facebook
  • Share via LinkedIn
  • Share via Whatsapp
  • Share via Messenger
  • Share via Email