Schema-Adaptive Tabular Representation Learning with LLMs for Generalizable Multimodal Clinical Reasoning

Machine learning for tabular data remains constrained by poor schema generalization, a challenge rooted in the lack of semantic understanding of structured variables. This challenge is particularly acute in domains like clinical medicine, where electronic health record (EHR) schemas vary significantly. To solve this problem, we propose Schema-Adaptive Tabular Representation Learning, a novel method that leverages large language models (LLMs) to create transferable tabular embeddings. By transforming structured variables into semantic natural language statements and encoding them with a pretrained LLM, our approach enables zero-shot alignment across unseen schemas without manual feature engineering or retraining. We integrate our encoder into a multimodal framework for dementia diagnosis, combining tabular and MRI data. Experiments on NACC and ADNI datasets demonstrate state-of-the-art performance and successful zero-shot transfer to unseen schemas, significantly outperforming clinical baselines, including board-certified neurologists, in retrospective diagnostic tasks. These results validate our LLM-driven approach as a scalable, robust solution for heterogeneous real-world data, offering a pathway to extend LLM-based reasoning to structured domains.

Beyond Classification Accuracy: Neural-MedBench and the Need for Deeper Reasoning Benchmarks

Recent advances in vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable performance on standard medical benchmarks, yet their true clinical reasoning ability remains unclear. Existing datasets predominantly emphasize classification accuracy, creating an evaluation illusion in which models appear proficient while still failing at high-stakes diagnostic reasoning. We introduce Neural-MedBench, a compact yet reasoning-intensive benchmark specifically designed to probe the limits of multimodal clinical reasoning in neurology. Neural-MedBench integrates multi-sequence MRI scans, structured electronic health records, and clinical notes, and encompasses three core task families: differential diagnosis, lesion recognition, and rationale generation. To ensure reliable evaluation, we develop a hybrid scoring pipeline that combines LLM-based graders, clinician validation, and semantic similarity metrics. Through systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art VLMs, including GPT-4o, Claude-4, and MedGemma, we observe a sharp performance drop compared to conventional datasets. Error analysis shows that reasoning failures, rather than perceptual errors, dominate model shortcomings. Our findings highlight the necessity of a Two-Axis Evaluation Framework: breadth-oriented large datasets for statistical generalization, and depth-oriented, compact benchmarks such as Neural-MedBench for reasoning fidelity. We release Neural-MedBench at https://neuromedbench.github.io/ as an open and extensible diagnostic testbed, which guides the expansion of future benchmarks and enables rigorous yet cost-effective assessment of clinically trustworthy AI.