Fault Inception Detection in Real-World Disturbance Data for Power System Protection

Large collections of real-world disturbance recordings are increasingly available in transmission networks, but their value for power system protection and automated disturbance analysis is limited by the absence of precise event-onset annotations. In practice, field-recorded voltage and current waveforms contain switching operations, transformer energization, resonance, saturation, and other non-ideal effects that can obscure or mimic genuine fault signatures, making reliable fault inception detection difficult. This paper presents an training-free framework for fault inception detection in real-world transmission disturbance data. The method combines protection-domain indicators, robust median/MAD-based normalization, a low-latency transient path, and persistence-aware fusion and veto logic to distinguish fault-consistent disturbances from non-fault transients. We apply the framework to 12053 transmission-level recordings from the publicly available RTE database and further assess detector performance on a manually reviewed subset of 300 events. On the reviewed subset, the detector achieves 96.6% recall, 79.2% precision, and a median timing error of 4.2ms for matched detections. These results indicate that the proposed approach can support protection-oriented disturbance screening, relay and post-event analysis, and the creation of timestamp annotations for downstream data-driven monitoring tasks.

A Scoping Review of Machine Learning Applications in Power System Protection and Disturbance Management

The integration of renewable and distributed energy resources reshapes modern power systems, challenging conventional protection schemes. This scoping review synthesizes recent literature on machine learning (ML) applications in power system protection and disturbance management, following the PRISMA for Scoping Reviews framework. Based on over 100 publications, three key objectives are addressed: (i) assessing the scope of ML research in protection tasks; (ii) evaluating ML performance across diverse operational scenarios; and (iii) identifying methods suitable for evolving grid conditions. ML models often demonstrate high accuracy on simulated datasets; however, their performance under real-world conditions remains insufficiently validated. The existing literature is fragmented, with inconsistencies in methodological rigor, dataset quality, and evaluation metrics. This lack of standardization hampers the comparability of results and limits the generalizability of findings. To address these challenges, this review introduces a ML-oriented taxonomy for protection tasks, resolves key terminological inconsistencies, and advocates for standardized reporting practices. It further provides guidelines for comprehensive dataset documentation, methodological transparency, and consistent evaluation protocols, aiming to improve reproducibility and enhance the practical relevance of research outcomes. Critical gaps remain, including the scarcity of real-world validation, insufficient robustness testing, and limited consideration of deployment feasibility. Future research should prioritize public benchmark datasets, realistic validation methods, and advanced ML architectures. These steps are essential to move ML-based protection from theoretical promise to practical deployment in increasingly dynamic and decentralized power systems.