SmokeGS-R: Physics-Guided Pseudo-Clean 3DGS for Real-World Multi-View Smoke Restoration

Real-world smoke simultaneously attenuates scene radiance, adds airlight, and destabilizes multi-view appearance consistency, making robust 3D reconstruction particularly difficult. We present \textbf{SmokeGS-R}, a practical pipeline developed for the NTIRE 2026 3D Restoration and Reconstruction Track 2 challenge. The key idea is to decouple geometry recovery from appearance correction: we generate physics-guided pseudo-clean supervision with a refined dark channel prior and guided filtering, train a sharp clean-only 3D Gaussian Splatting source model, and then harmonize its renderings with a donor ensemble using geometric-mean reference aggregation, LAB-space Reinhard transfer, and light Gaussian smoothing. On the official challenge testing leaderboard, the final submission achieved \mbox{PSNR $=15.217$} and \mbox{SSIM $=0.666$}. After the public release of RealX3D, we re-evaluated the same frozen result on the seven released challenge scenes without retraining and obtained \mbox{PSNR $=15.209$}, \mbox{SSIM $=0.644$}, and \mbox{LPIPS $=0.551$}, outperforming the strongest official baseline average on the same scenes by $+3.68$ dB PSNR. These results suggest that a geometry-first reconstruction strategy combined with stable post-render appearance harmonization is an effective recipe for real-world multi-view smoke restoration. The code is available at https://github.com/windrise/3drr_Track2_SmokeGS-R.

NTIRE 2026 3D Restoration and Reconstruction in Real-world Adverse Conditions: RealX3D Challenge Results

This paper presents a comprehensive review of the NTIRE 2026 3D Restoration and Reconstruction (3DRR) Challenge, detailing the proposed methods and results. The challenge seeks to identify robust reconstruction pipelines that are robust under real-world adverse conditions, specifically extreme low-light and smoke-degraded environments, as captured by our RealX3D benchmark. A total of 279 participants registered for the competition, of whom 33 teams submitted valid results. We thoroughly evaluate the submitted approaches against state-of-the-art baselines, revealing significant progress in 3D reconstruction under adverse conditions. Our analysis highlights shared design principles among top-performing methods and provides insights into effective strategies for handling 3D scene degradation.