DPOAD: Differentially Private Outsourcing of Anomaly Detection through Iterative Sensitivity Learning

Outsourcing anomaly detection to third-parties can allow data owners to overcome resource constraints (e.g., in lightweight IoT devices), facilitate collaborative analysis (e.g., under distributed or multi-party scenarios), and benefit from lower costs and specialized expertise (e.g., of Managed Security Service Providers). Despite such benefits, a data owner may feel reluctant to outsource anomaly detection without sufficient privacy protection. To that end, most existing privacy solutions would face a novel challenge, i.e., preserving privacy usually requires the difference between data entries to be eliminated or reduced, whereas anomaly detection critically depends on that difference. Such a conflict is recently resolved under a local analysis setting with trusted analysts (where no outsourcing is involved) through moving the focus of differential privacy (DP) guarantee from "all" to only "benign" entries. In this paper, we observe that such an approach is not directly applicable to the outsourcing setting, because data owners do not know which entries are "benign" prior to outsourcing, and hence cannot selectively apply DP on data entries. Therefore, we propose a novel iterative solution for the data owner to gradually "disentangle" the anomalous entries from the benign ones such that the third-party analyst can produce accurate anomaly results with sufficient DP guarantee. We design and implement our Differentially Private Outsourcing of Anomaly Detection (DPOAD) framework, and demonstrate its benefits over baseline Laplace and PainFree mechanisms through experiments with real data from different application domains.

Galaxy classification: A machine learning analysis of GAMA catalogue data

We present a machine learning analysis of five labelled galaxy catalogues from the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): The SersicCatVIKING and SersicCatUKIDSS catalogues containing morphological features, the GaussFitSimple catalogue containing spectroscopic features, the MagPhys catalogue including physical parameters for galaxies, and the Lambdar catalogue, which contains photometric measurements. Extending work previously presented at the ESANN 2018 conference - in an analysis based on Generalized Relevance Matrix Learning Vector Quantization and Random Forests - we find that neither the data from the individual catalogues nor a combined dataset based on all 5 catalogues fully supports the visual-inspection-based galaxy classification scheme employed to categorise the galaxies. In particular, only one class, the Little Blue Spheroids, is consistently separable from the other classes. To aid further insight into the nature of the employed visual-based classification scheme with respect to physical and morphological features, we present the galaxy parameters that are discriminative for the achieved class distinctions.