XRF-to-Optical Field-of-View Localization with Vision Language Models

Registering images acquired with different microscopy modalities is essential for relating complementary measurements of the same specimen. In correlative X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and optical microscopy, the XRF map often covers only a small region of an optical image acquired from the same or an adjacent tissue section. Field-of-view (FOV) localization is necessary but can be difficult when appearance and structure differ across modalities. Here we evaluate training-free vision language model (VLM) localization on two datasets representing same-section high-correspondence and adjacent-section low-correspondence imaging. We test unconstrained and metadata-constrained search and compare VLMs with geometric controls, classical template matching, and two alternative training-free approaches (DINOv2 and multiGradICON). Direct VLM prompting produced content-dependent spatial signals but was not reliable alone. Classical matching was most accurate when cross-modal structure was preserved but failed in the low-correspondence collection. A proposal-and-verify workflow used repeated VLM predictions as candidates and image-based similarity to select the final location. This workflow recovered useful localization in the low-correspondence regime.

Acquisition Geometry-Assisted Whole-Group Localization of X-ray Fluorescence Maps in Optical Microscopy Images

X-ray fluorescence (XRF) microscopy maps elemental distributions, while optical microscopy can provide complementary morphological context. Localizing XRF fields of view (FOVs) in optical images is difficult because the two modalities differ in contrast mechanism and resolution. Most current workflows place each XRF tile independently, even when acquisition metadata already record the tiles' relative scan positions. This study formalizes XRF tile-group localization, in which one optical-frame placement is estimated for the whole group, constrained by acquisition geometry and quantified using group intersection-over-union (GroupIoU). In a controlled case study, independent localization failed with GroupIoU 0.000, whereas group localization achieved 0.931. Replacing the normalized cross-correlation (NCC) metric with mutual information (MI) gave nearly identical results, showing that the outcome is not specific to one local similarity metric. In another multiscale case study, using a coarse XRF survey scan to connect the fine-scale tile group to the optical image increased mean GroupIoU from 0.694 to 0.856. These case studies support using acquisition geometry as an explicit constraint when localizing related XRF tiles.