RiskNet: A large-scale dataset of AI risk incidents from news with alignment and multi-dimensional annotations

As artificial intelligence (AI) systems are increasingly deployed across socially consequential domains, reports of AI-related harms and failures have grown in frequency and diversity. Although existing governance frameworks articulate high-level principles for responsible AI, large-scale empirical resources for tracking and analyzing real-world AI risk incidents remain limited. Existing incident collections are often manually curated, relatively small in scale, and insufficient for continuous, data-driven monitoring and downstream computational analysis. To address this need, we present RiskNet, a large-scale dataset of AI risk incidents constructed from large-scale multilingual news sources. RiskNet applies a structured pipeline for AI risk news identification, event-level report screening, incident alignment, and multi-dimensional incident classification. The resulting resource organizes dispersed news reports into incident-centered records and provides benchmark datasets for event classification, incident alignment, and incident-level risk labeling. In its current release, RiskNet covers hundreds of millions of source records and yields a large-scale collection of AI risk-related reports, including aligned incident clusters and annotated benchmark subsets. The dataset is also accessible through an online platform for browsing and exploration. We describe the data sources, processing workflow, taxonomy design, and technical validation of the resource. RiskNet is intended to support downstream research on AI safety, governance, risk analysis, and benchmarking, as well as longitudinal and cross-source analyses of AI-related harms. By providing a structured and reusable empirical resource, RiskNet helps bridge the gap between high-level governance principles and the documented realities of AI risk incidents.

Legal-DC: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Legal Documents

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising technology for legal document consultation, yet its application in Chinese legal scenarios faces two key limitations: existing benchmarks lack specialized support for joint retriever-generator evaluation, and mainstream RAG systems often fail to accommodate the structured nature of legal provisions. To address these gaps, this study advances two core contributions: First, we constructed the Legal-DC benchmark dataset, comprising 480 legal documents (covering areas such as market regulation and contract management) and 2,475 refined question-answer pairs, each annotated with clause-level references, filling the gap for specialized evaluation resources in Chinese legal RAG. Second, we propose the LegRAG framework, which integrates legal adaptive indexing (clause-boundary segmentation) with a dual-path self-reflection mechanism to ensure clause integrity while enhancing answer accuracy. Third, we introduce automated evaluation methods for large language models to meet the high-reliability demands of legal retrieval scenarios. LegRAG outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods by 1.3% to 5.6% across key evaluation metrics. This research provides a specialized benchmark, practical framework, and empirical insights to advance the development of Chinese legal RAG systems. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/legal-dc/Legal-DC.

KID: Knowledge-Injected Dual-Head Learning for Knowledge-Grounded Harmful Meme Detection

Internet memes have become pervasive carriers of digital culture on social platforms. However, their heavy reliance on metaphors and sociocultural context also makes them subtle vehicles for harmful content, posing significant challenges for automated content moderation. Existing approaches primarily focus on intra-modal and inter-modal signal analysis, while the understanding of implicit toxicity often depends on background knowledge that is not explicitly present in the meme itself. To address this challenge, we propose KID, a Knowledge-Injected Dual-Head Learning framework for knowledge-grounded harmful meme detection. KID adopts a label-constrained distillation paradigm to decompose complex meme understanding into structured reasoning chains that explicitly link visual evidence, background knowledge, and classification labels. These chains guide the learning process by grounding external knowledge in meme-specific contexts. In addition, KID employs a dual-head architecture that jointly optimizes semantic generation and classification objectives, enabling aligned linguistic reasoning while maintaining stable decision boundaries. Extensive experiments on five multilingual datasets spanning English, Chinese, and low-resource Bengali demonstrate that KID achieves SOTA performance on both binary and multi-label harmful meme detection tasks, improving over previous best methods by 2.1%--19.7% across primary evaluation metrics. Ablation studies further confirm the effectiveness of knowledge injection and dual-head joint learning, highlighting their complementary contributions to robust and generalizable meme understanding. The code and data are available at https://github.com/PotatoDog1669/KID.