Abstract:Sidewalk width is an important indicator of pedestrian accessibility, comfort, and network quality, yet large-scale width data remain scarce in most cities. Existing approaches typically rely on costly field surveys, high-resolution overhead imagery, or simplified geometric assumptions that limit scalability or introduce systematic error. To address this gap, we present UrbanVGGT, a measurement pipeline for estimating metric sidewalk width from a single street-view image. The method combines semantic segmentation, feed-forward 3D reconstruction, adaptive ground-plane fitting, camera-height-based scale calibration, and directional width measurement on the recovered plane. On a ground-truth benchmark from Washington, D.C., UrbanVGGT achieves a mean absolute error of 0.252 m, with 95.5% of estimates within 0.50 m of the reference width. Ablation experiments show that metric scale calibration is the most critical component, and controlled comparisons with alternative geometry backbones support the effectiveness of the overall design. As a feasibility demonstration, we further apply the pipeline to three cities and generate SV-SideWidth, a prototype sidewalk-width dataset covering 527 OpenStreetMap street segments. The results indicate that street-view imagery can support scalable generation of candidate sidewalk-width attributes, while broader cross-city validation and local ground-truth auditing remain necessary before deployment as authoritative planning data.
Abstract:Vision-language models (VLMs) perform strongly on spatial reasoning benchmarks, yet how they encode directional relations remains poorly understood. Existing attribution methods such as GradCAM and attention rollout reveal where a model attends, but not what direction it infers between objects. We introduce CREG (Compass Relational Evidence Graph), a training-free interpretability framework that projects multi-layer contrastive Grad-times-Act attributions into a reference-centered polar coordinate system, producing a directional evidence distribution over compass sectors. To evaluate directional explanations, we propose three metrics: Direction Alignment Error (DAE), Edge Accuracy (EA), and Causal Occlusion Score (COS). On Qwen2-VL-7B across VSR and COCO-Pairs, CREG consistently outperforms standard attribution baselines; on COCO-Pairs, prediction-targeted CREG achieves a DAE of 55.5 degrees and an EA of 0.553, improving over attention rollout by 16.1 degrees in angular error and 0.120 in EA. Causal occlusion experiments on 540 samples across both datasets further support the faithfulness of these directional explanations, with COS greater than or equal to +0.42. The gains are smaller on Qwen2-VL-2B, suggesting that CREG benefits from the more structured spatial representations that emerge at larger scales. Overall, our results show that contrastive, multi-layer attribution can expose directional evidence more faithfully than standard saliency-based explanations in VLM spatial reasoning.




Abstract:Historic urban quarters play a vital role in preserving cultural heritage while serving as vibrant spaces for tourism and everyday life. Understanding how tourists perceive these environments is essential for sustainable, human-centered urban planning. This study proposes a multidimensional AI-powered framework for analyzing tourist perception in historic urban quarters using multimodal data from social media. Applied to twelve historic quarters in central Shanghai, the framework integrates focal point extraction, color theme analysis, and sentiment mining. Visual focus areas are identified from tourist-shared photos using a fine-tuned semantic segmentation model. To assess aesthetic preferences, dominant colors are extracted using a clustering method, and their spatial distribution across quarters is analyzed. Color themes are further compared between social media photos and real-world street views, revealing notable shifts. This divergence highlights potential gaps between visual expectations and the built environment, reflecting both stylistic preferences and perceptual bias. Tourist reviews are evaluated through a hybrid sentiment analysis approach combining a rule-based method and a multi-task BERT model. Satisfaction is assessed across four dimensions: tourist activities, built environment, service facilities, and business formats. The results reveal spatial variations in aesthetic appeal and emotional response. Rather than focusing on a single technical innovation, this framework offers an integrated, data-driven approach to decoding tourist perception and contributes to informed decision-making in tourism, heritage conservation, and the design of aesthetically engaging public spaces.