Resilient Byzantine Agreement with Predictions

This paper studies the Byzantine Agreement problem where the nodes have access to a predictor that flags nodes for suspicion of faulty (Byzantine) behavior. We focus on algorithmic resilience -- the maximum number of faulty nodes an algorithm can tolerate -- and present algorithms and impossibility results whose resilience depend on the accuracy of the predictor. As our first main result, we bring a complete characterization of the consistency--robustness trade-offs in both the non-authenticated and authenticated settings: for $n$ nodes and a parameter $α\in [0, 1]$, we present algorithms that tolerate up to $α\cdot n$ faulty nodes when the predictor is correct (consistency), and up to $\frac{1-α}{2} \cdot n - 1$ faulty nodes when the predictor is arbitrarily wrong (robustness); in the authenticated setting the robustness bound improves to $(1-α) \cdot n - 1$. These trade-offs are exactly tight as we show that one additional faulty node renders the problem impossible. Our second main result characterizes smoothness: the rate at which resilience degrades as the predictor becomes less accurate. We show that resilience linearly decreases in the number of wrong predictions as long as that number stays within a constant fraction of $n$. Concretely, in the non-authenticated setting each additional wrong prediction loses one unit of resilience, whereas in the authenticated setting the decline is halved since two wrong predictions are needed to lose one unit of resilience.

Online Algorithms with Unreliable Guidance

This paper introduces a new model for ML-augmented online decision making, called online algorithms with unreliable guidance (OAG). This model completely separates between the predictive and algorithmic components, thus offering a single well-defined analysis framework that relies solely on the considered problem. Formulated through the lens of request-answer games, an OAG algorithm receives, with each incoming request, a piece of guidance which is taken from the problem's answer space; ideally, this guidance is the optimal answer for the current request, however with probability $β$, the guidance is adversarially corrupted. The goal is to develop OAG algorithms that admit good competitiveness when $β= 0$ (a.k.a. consistency) as well as when $β= 1$ (a.k.a. robustness); the appealing notion of smoothness, that in most prior work required a dedicated loss function, now arises naturally as $β$ shifts from $0$ to $1$. We then describe a systematic method, called the drop or trust blindly (DTB) compiler, which transforms any online algorithm into a learning-augmented online algorithm in the OAG model. Given a prediction-oblivious online algorithm, its learning-augmented counterpart produced by applying the DTB compiler either follows the incoming guidance blindly or ignores it altogether and proceeds as the initial algorithm would have; the choice between these two alternatives is based on the outcome of a (biased) coin toss. As our main technical contribution, we prove (rigorously) that although remarkably simple, the class of algorithms produced via the DTB compiler includes algorithms with attractive consistency-robustness guarantees for three classic online problems: for caching and uniform metrical task systems our algorithms are optimal, whereas for bipartite matching (with adversarial arrival order), our algorithm outperforms the state-of-the-art.