3D-DefectBench: A Controlled Factorial Study of Vision-Language Model Evaluation Pipelines for Fine-Grained 3D Generation Defects

Automated evaluation is essential for scaling generative 3D systems, where exhaustive human review is costly and slow. However, the reliability of an automated judge depends on the entire evaluation pipeline, not only the underlying vision-language model (VLM), but also how assets are rendered, what visual evidence is provided, how the task is specified, and how human reference labels are constructed. We introduce 3D-DefectBench, a benchmark and framework for systematic analysis of VLM-based 3D defect detection pipelines. It complements holistic ratings and pairwise preferences with nine fine-grained binary defects spanning geometry, texture, and prompt adherence, providing actionable diagnostics for generator development and judge evaluation. Using a balanced factorial design, we vary four pipeline factors, VLM, camera protocol, visual input, and prompt schema, across 84 inference designs and approximately 3.2 million scored defect decisions, followed by staged validation on a broader set of frontier models. Model choice is the largest determinant of agreement with human labels, but the remaining factors also affect performance, interact with model selection, and can change the best configuration. Within the evaluated design space, a compact six-view RGB protocol performs comparably to denser multi-view settings and inputs augmented with depth or surface normals, making it a strong cost-effective default. Under this standardized pipeline, the best of 12 VLM judges still lag behind trained human labelers, while texture agreement drops sharply when expert-consensus labels are replaced by noisier silver labels. These findings show that automated judges should be evaluated as complete pipelines and calibrated across human reference regimes, rather than benchmarked only as standalone models. We release labels, prompts, predictions, and Croissant metadata on Hugging Face.

HERO: Improving the Reliability and Sensitivity of Generative Model Evaluation Using Historical Data

Reliable generative AI models critically rely on expert human annotations to evaluate output quality, yet these "gold" labels are expensive to collect and limited in quantity. Organizations thus often turn to collecting vast but noisy "silver" labels from crowdsourced workers or vendor annotators as proxies for gold labels. Because gold remains the evaluation target, naively aggregating noisy silver labels may introduce bias, and estimators built on sparsely observed gold labels may have high variance to resolve the model performance gaps that guide practical decisions. Model evaluation has become an ongoing operational practice rather than a one-time exercise, with evaluation rounds repeating across model versions, releases, and content domains. A natural question is whether the previous historical evaluation data can be used to improve each new round of evaluation. We introduce HERO (History Enhanced RObust model evaluation), a novel framework that uses historical data to suppress bias (improve reliability) and reduce variance (improve sensitivity) in model performance evaluation. HERO calibrates silver labelers' performance learned from historical gold annotations, and stabilizes the resulting estimator by anchoring it to covariate information measured with high precision in the historical data. HERO can be broadly applied across multiple common evaluation tasks, and remains valid when only a subset of historical labelers appears in the current round. We establish conditions under which the bias and variance reductions hold, showcase HERO's performance in simulation studies, and demonstrate its effectiveness on real-world model evaluation benchmarking datasets.

DB-3DME: From Dataset to Benchmark for Human-aligned Automatic 3D Mesh Evaluation

Recent advances in 3D generation have led to substantial improvements in realism, controllability, and efficiency, yet the evaluation of 3D assets remains underexplored. Existing evaluation paradigms, including human evaluation, learned metrics, and vision-language models (VLMs) as judges, suffer from limitations in cost, scalability, resolution handling, or task-specific alignment. In this work, we focus on 3D mesh evaluation and introduce DB-3DME, the Dataset and Benchmark for 3D Mesh Evaluation. DB-3DME contains 2,619 synthetic 3D meshes paired with human ratings on Geometry and Prompt Adherence. Using this dataset, we systematically benchmark state-of-the-art VLMs and identify visual encoding of 3D representations as a key factor for human-aligned evaluation performance. Motivated by this finding, we fine-tune an open-weight VLM, Qwen-2.5-VL-7B, for 3D mesh evaluation by adapting the visual encoder while freezing the language model. The fine-tuned model substantially outperforms existing pre-trained VLMs across multiple evaluation dimensions, establishing a new benchmark for automatic 3D mesh evaluation. We publicly release the benchmark dataset on GitHub and Hugging Face to facilitate future research.

Efficient Subgroup Analysis via Optimal Trees with Global Parameter Fusion

Identifying and making statistical inferences on differential treatment effects (commonly known as subgroup analysis in clinical research) is central to precision health. Subgroup analysis allows practitioners to pinpoint populations for whom a treatment is especially beneficial or protective, thereby advancing targeted interventions. Tree based recursive partitioning methods are widely used for subgroup analysis due to their interpretability. Nevertheless, these approaches encounter significant limitations, including suboptimal partitions induced by greedy heuristics and overfitting from locally estimated splits, especially under limited sample sizes. To address these limitations, we propose a fused optimal causal tree method that leverages mixed integer optimization (MIO) to facilitate precise subgroup identification. Our approach ensures globally optimal partitions and introduces a parameter fusion constraint to facilitate information sharing across related subgroups. This design substantially improves subgroup discovery accuracy and enhances statistical efficiency. We provide theoretical guarantees by rigorously establishing out of sample risk bounds and comparing them with those of classical tree based methods. Empirically, our method consistently outperforms popular baselines in simulations. Finally, we demonstrate its practical utility through a case study on the Health and Aging Brain Study Health Disparities (HABS-HD) dataset, where our approach yields clinically meaningful insights.