DDO-RM for LLM Preference Optimization: A Minimal Held-Out Benchmark against DPO

This paper reorganizes the current manuscript around the DPO versus DDO-RM preference-optimization project and focuses on two parts: the algorithmic view and the preliminary held-out benchmark. The benchmark asks a narrow question: even in a minimal pairwise chosen-versus-rejected setting, can a reward-guided decision-distribution update outperform a direct pairwise objective? We compare Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) against DDO-RM on EleutherAI/pythia-410m using HuggingFaceH4/ultrafeedback\_binarized, evaluate on the held-out test\_prefs split, and report results for seeds 42, 13, and 3407. Algorithmically, DDO-RM treats each prompt as a finite decision problem over candidate responses. Instead of optimizing only a binary chosen-rejected relation, it forms a policy distribution over candidates, centers reward-model scores under that distribution, and distills a reward-guided target distribution back into the policy. In the current public benchmark, DDO-RM improves mean pair accuracy from 0.5238 to 0.5602, AUC from 0.5315 to 0.5382, and mean margin from 0.1377 to 0.5353 relative to DPO. These are encouraging but still preliminary results: the study covers one model family, one dataset, one held-out evaluation split, and three seeds.

On Pareto Optimality for the Multinomial Logistic Bandit

We provide a new online learning algorithm for tackling the Multinomial Logit Bandit (MNL-Bandit) problem. Despite the challenges posed by the combinatorial nature of the MNL model, we develop a novel Upper Confidence Bound (UCB)-based method that achieves Pareto optimality by balancing regret minimization and estimation error of the assortment revenues and the MNL parameters. We develop theoretical guarantees characterizing the tradeoff between regret and estimation error for the MNL-Bandit problem through information-theoretic bounds, and propose a modified UCB algorithm that incorporates forced exploration to improve parameter estimation accuracy while maintaining low regret. Our analysis sheds critical insights into how to optimally balance the collected revenues and the treatment estimation in dynamic assortment optimization.