RF-HOI: Recognize Human-Object Interaction with Radio Frequency Signals

Recognizing Human-Object Interactions (HOI) is essential for intelligent systems, underpinning applications in virtual and augmented reality, embodied AI, and assistive robotics. However, vision-based HOI methods face challenges in privacy concerns and poor light conditions. In this work, we introduce RF-HOI, the first framework that only uses radio frequency (RF) signals for HOI recognition. A key challenge of RF-HOI is that single-modality RF sensing is insufficient to recognize both actions and the objects being interacted with. RF-HOI addresses this through a novel modality fusion that combines mmWave radar and RFID, enabling simultaneous action recognition and target identification. Another challenge is limited training data across diverse setups, which impairs the generalizability of the recognition model. To overcome this, we develop a simulator that synthesizes multimodal RF data for diverse HOIs at scale, allowing us to fine-tune with only a small amount of real-world data. Experiment results show that RF-HOI outperforms all baselines, approaching vision model performance, and that our diverse synthetic training data can significantly boost our system's performance on real-world scenarios. These results highlight the potential of multimodal RF sensing for robust and privacy-preserving HOI recognition as well as the effectiveness of our RF data synthesis.

Certified Mitigation of Worst-Case LLM Copyright Infringement

The exposure of large language models (LLMs) to copyrighted material during pre-training raises concerns about unintentional copyright infringement post deployment. This has driven the development of "copyright takedown" methods, post-training approaches aimed at preventing models from generating content substantially similar to copyrighted ones. While current mitigation approaches are somewhat effective for average-case risks, we demonstrate that they overlook worst-case copyright risks exhibits by the existence of long, verbatim quotes from copyrighted sources. We propose BloomScrub, a remarkably simple yet highly effective inference-time approach that provides certified copyright takedown. Our method repeatedly interleaves quote detection with rewriting techniques to transform potentially infringing segments. By leveraging efficient data sketches (Bloom filters), our approach enables scalable copyright screening even for large-scale real-world corpora. When quotes beyond a length threshold cannot be removed, the system can abstain from responding, offering certified risk reduction. Experimental results show that BloomScrub reduces infringement risk, preserves utility, and accommodates different levels of enforcement stringency with adaptive abstention. Our results suggest that lightweight, inference-time methods can be surprisingly effective for copyright prevention.

Language Models Benefit from Preparation with Elicited Knowledge

The zero-shot chain of thought (CoT) approach is often used in question answering (QA) by language models (LMs) for tasks that require multiple reasoning steps, typically enhanced by the prompt "Let's think step by step." However, some QA tasks hinge more on accessing relevant knowledge than on chaining reasoning steps. We introduce a simple general prompting technique, called PREP, that involves using two instances of LMs: the first (LM1) generates relevant information, and the second (LM2) answers the question based on this information. PREP is designed to be general and independent of the user's domain knowledge, making it applicable across various QA tasks without the need for specialized prompt engineering. To evaluate the effectiveness of our prompting method, we create a dataset of 100 binary-choice questions, derived from an extensive schematic dataset on artifact parts and material composition. These questions ask which of two artifacts is less likely to share materials with another artifact. Such questions probe the LM's knowledge of shared materials in the part structure of different artifacts. We test our method on our dataset and three published commonsense reasoning datasets. The average accuracy of our method is consistently higher than that of all the other tested methods across all the tested datasets.