Bridging the Evaluation Gap: Standardized Benchmarks for Multi-Objective Search

Empirical evaluation in multi-objective search (MOS) has historically suffered from fragmentation, relying on heterogeneous problem instances with incompatible objective definitions that make cross-study comparisons difficult. This standardization gap is further exacerbated by the realization that DIMACS road networks, a historical default benchmark for the field, exhibit highly correlated objectives that fail to capture diverse Pareto-front structures. To address this, we introduce the first comprehensive, standardized benchmark suite for exact and approximate MOS. Our suite spans four structurally diverse domains: real-world road networks, structured synthetic graphs, game-based grid environments, and high-dimensional robotic motion-planning roadmaps. By providing fixed graph instances, standardized start-goal queries, and both exact and approximate reference Pareto-optimal solution sets, this suite captures a full spectrum of objective interactions: from strongly correlated to strictly independent. Ultimately, this benchmark provides a common foundation to ensure future MOS evaluations are robust, reproducible, and structurally comprehensive.

Generalizing Multi-Objective Search via Objective-Aggregation Functions

Multi-objective search (MOS) has become essential in robotics, as real-world robotic systems need to simultaneously balance multiple, often conflicting objectives. Recent works explore complex interactions between objectives, leading to problem formulations that do not allow the usage of out-of-the-box state-of-the-art MOS algorithms. In this paper, we suggest a generalized problem formulation that optimizes solution objectives via aggregation functions of hidden (search) objectives. We show that our formulation supports the application of standard MOS algorithms, necessitating only to properly extend several core operations to reflect the specific aggregation functions employed. We demonstrate our approach in several diverse robotics planning problems, spanning motion-planning for navigation, manipulation and planning fr medical systems under obstacle uncertainty as well as inspection planning, and route planning with different road types. We solve the problems using state-of-the-art MOS algorithms after properly extending their core operations, and provide empirical evidence that they outperform by orders of magnitude the vanilla versions of the algorithms applied to the same problems but without objective aggregation.