README: Bridging Medical Jargon and Lay Understanding for Patient Education through Data-Centric NLP

The advancement in healthcare has shifted focus toward patient-centric approaches, particularly in self-care and patient education, facilitated by access to Electronic Health Records (EHR). However, medical jargon in EHRs poses significant challenges in patient comprehension. To address this, we introduce a new task of automatically generating lay definitions, aiming to simplify complex medical terms into patient-friendly lay language. We first created the README dataset, an extensive collection of over 20,000 unique medical terms and 300,000 mentions, each offering context-aware lay definitions manually annotated by domain experts. We have also engineered a data-centric Human-AI pipeline that synergizes data filtering, augmentation, and selection to improve data quality. We then used README as the training data for models and leveraged a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) method to reduce hallucinations and improve the quality of model outputs. Our extensive automatic and human evaluations demonstrate that open-source mobile-friendly models, when fine-tuned with high-quality data, are capable of matching or even surpassing the performance of state-of-the-art closed-source large language models like ChatGPT. This research represents a significant stride in closing the knowledge gap in patient education and advancing patient-centric healthcare solutions

GraB-sampler: Optimal Permutation-based SGD Data Sampler for PyTorch

The online Gradient Balancing (GraB) algorithm greedily choosing the examples ordering by solving the herding problem using per-sample gradients is proved to be the theoretically optimal solution that guarantees to outperform Random Reshuffling. However, there is currently no efficient implementation of GraB for the community to easily use it. This work presents an efficient Python library, $\textit{GraB-sampler}$, that allows the community to easily use GraB algorithms and proposes 5 variants of the GraB algorithm. The best performance result of the GraB-sampler reproduces the training loss and test accuracy results while only in the cost of 8.7% training time overhead and 0.85% peak GPU memory usage overhead.