Hedging using reinforcement learning: Contextual $k$-Armed Bandit versus $Q$-learning

The construction of replication strategies for contingent claims in the presence of risk and market friction is a key problem of financial engineering. In real markets, continuous replication, such as in the model of Black, Scholes and Merton, is not only unrealistic but it is also undesirable due to high transaction costs. Over the last decades stochastic optimal-control methods have been developed to balance between effective replication and losses. More recently, with the rise of artificial intelligence, temporal-difference Reinforcement Learning, in particular variations of $Q$-learning in conjunction with Deep Neural Networks, have attracted significant interest. From a practical point of view, however, such methods are often relatively sample inefficient, hard to train and lack performance guarantees. This motivates the investigation of a stable benchmark algorithm for hedging. In this article, the hedging problem is viewed as an instance of a risk-averse contextual $k$-armed bandit problem, for which a large body of theoretical results and well-studied algorithms are available. We find that the $k$-armed bandit model naturally fits to the $P\&L$ formulation of hedging, providing for a more accurate and sample efficient approach than $Q$-learning and reducing to the Black-Scholes model in the absence of transaction costs and risks.

Adaptive Bayesian Reticulum

Neural Networks and Random Forests: two popular techniques for supervised learning that are seemingly disconnected in their formulation and optimization method, have recently been linked in a single construct. The connection pivots on assembling an artificial Neural Network with nodes that allow for a gate-like function to mimic a tree split, optimized using the standard approach of recursively applying the chain rule to update its parameters. Yet two main challenges have impeded wide use of this hybrid approach: \emph{(a)} the inability of global gradient descent techniques to optimize hierarchical parameters (as introduced by the gate function); and \emph{(b)} the construction of the tree structure, which has relied on standard decision tree algorithms to learn the network topology or incrementally (and heuristically) searching the space at random. We propose a probabilistic construct that exploits the idea of a node's \emph{unexplained potential} (the total error channeled through the node) in order to decide where to expand further, mimicking the standard tree construction in a Neural Network setting, alongside a modified gradient descent that first locally optimizes an expanded node before a global optimization. The probabilistic approach allows us to evaluate each new split as a ratio of likelihoods that balance the statistical improvement in explaining the evidence against the additional model complexity --- thus providing a natural stopping condition. The result is a novel classification and regression technique that leverages the strength of both: a tree-structure that grows naturally and is simple to interpret with the plasticity of Neural Networks that allow for soft margins and slanted boundaries.

A Bayesian Decision Tree Algorithm

Bayesian Decision Trees are known for their probabilistic interpretability. However, their construction can sometimes be costly. In this article we present a general Bayesian Decision Tree algorithm applicable to both regression and classification problems. The algorithm does not apply Markov Chain Monte Carlo and does not require a pruning step. While it is possible to construct a weighted probability tree space we find that one particular tree, the greedy-modal tree (GMT), explains most of the information contained in the numerical examples. This approach seems to perform similarly to Random Forests.

An Efficient Algorithm for Bayesian Nearest Neighbours

K-Nearest Neighbours (k-NN) is a popular classification and regression algorithm, yet one of its main limitations is the difficulty in choosing the number of neighbours. We present a Bayesian algorithm to compute the posterior probability distribution for k given a target point within a data-set, efficiently and without the use of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods or simulation - alongside an exact solution for distributions within the exponential family. The central idea is that data points around our target are generated by the same probability distribution, extending outwards over the appropriate, though unknown, number of neighbours. Once the data is projected onto a distance metric of choice, we can transform the choice of k into a change-point detection problem, for which there is an efficient solution: we recursively compute the probability of the last change-point as we move towards our target, and thus de facto compute the posterior probability distribution over k. Applying this approach to both a classification and a regression UCI data-sets, we compare favourably and, most importantly, by removing the need for simulation, we are able to compute the posterior probability of k exactly and rapidly. As an example, the computational time for the Ripley data-set is a few milliseconds compared to a few hours when using a MCMC approach.