Precise Shield: Explaining and Aligning VLLM Safety via Neuron-Level Guidance

In real-world deployments, Vision-Language Large Models (VLLMs) face critical challenges from multilingual and multimodal composite attacks: harmful images paired with low-resource language texts can easily bypass defenses designed for high-resource language scenarios, exposing structural blind spots in current cross-lingual and cross-modal safety methods. This raises a mechanistic question: where is safety capability instantiated within the model, and how is it distributed across languages and modalities? Prior studies on pure-text LLMs have identified cross-lingual shared safety neurons, suggesting that safety may be governed by a small subset of critical neurons. Leveraging this insight, we propose Precise Shield, a two-stage framework that first identifies safety neurons by contrasting activation patterns between harmful and benign inputs, and then constrains parameter updates strictly within this subspace via gradient masking with affecting fewer than 0.03% of parameters. This strategy substantially improves safety while preserving multilingual and multimodal generalization. Further analysis reveals a moderate overlap of safety neurons across languages and modalities, enabling zero-shot cross-lingual and cross-modal transfer of safety capabilities, and offering a new direction for neuron-level, transfer-based safety enhancement.

Lingua-SafetyBench: A Benchmark for Safety Evaluation of Multilingual Vision-Language Models

Robust safety of vision-language large models (VLLMs) under joint multilingual and multimodal inputs remains underexplored. Existing benchmarks are typically multilingual but text-only, or multimodal but monolingual. Recent multilingual multimodal red-teaming efforts render harmful prompts into images, yet rely heavily on typography-style visuals and lack semantically grounded image-text pairs, limiting coverage of realistic cross-modal interactions. We introduce Lingua-SafetyBench, a benchmark of 100,440 harmful image-text pairs across 10 languages, explicitly partitioned into image-dominant and text-dominant subsets to disentangle risk sources. Evaluating 11 open-source VLLMs reveals a consistent asymmetry: image-dominant risks yield higher ASR in high-resource languages, while text-dominant risks are more severe in non-high-resource languages. A controlled study on the Qwen series shows that scaling and version upgrades reduce Attack Success Rate (ASR) overall but disproportionately benefit HRLs, widening the gap between HRLs and Non-HRLs under text-dominant risks. This underscores the necessity of language- and modality-aware safety alignment beyond mere scaling.To facilitate reproducibility and future research, we will publicly release our benchmark, model checkpoints, and source code.The code and dataset will be available at https://github.com/zsxr15/Lingua-SafetyBench.Warning: this paper contains examples with unsafe content.