The PARLO Dementia Corpus: A German Multi-Center Resource for Alzheimer's Disease

Early and accessible detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains a major challenge, as current diagnostic methods often rely on costly and invasive biomarkers. Speech and language analysis has emerged as a promising non-invasive and scalable approach to detecting cognitive impairment, but research in this area is hindered by the lack of publicly available datasets, especially for languages other than English. This paper introduces the PARLO Dementia Corpus (PDC), a new multi-center, clinically validated German resource for AD collected across nine academic memory clinics in Germany. The dataset comprises speech recordings from individuals with AD-related mild cognitive impairment and mild to moderate dementia, as well as cognitively healthy controls. Speech was elicited using a standardized test battery of eight neuropsychological tasks, including confrontation naming, verbal fluency, word repetition, picture description, story reading, and recall tasks. In addition to audio recordings, the dataset includes manually verified transcriptions and detailed demographic, clinical, and biomarker metadata. Baseline experiments on ASR benchmarking, automated test evaluation, and LLM-based classification illustrate the feasibility of automatic, speech-based cognitive assessment and highlight the diagnostic value of recall-driven speech production. The PDC thus establishes the first publicly available German benchmark for multi-modal and cross-lingual research on neurodegenerative diseases.

Pitfalls and Limits in Automatic Dementia Assessment

Current work on speech-based dementia assessment focuses on either feature extraction to predict assessment scales, or on the automation of existing test procedures. Most research uses public data unquestioningly and rarely performs a detailed error analysis, focusing primarily on numerical performance. We perform an in-depth analysis of an automated standardized dementia assessment, the Syndrom-Kurz-Test. We find that while there is a high overall correlation with human annotators, due to certain artifacts, we observe high correlations for the severely impaired individuals, which is less true for the healthy or mildly impaired ones. Speech production decreases with cognitive decline, leading to overoptimistic correlations when test scoring relies on word naming. Depending on the test design, fallback handling introduces further biases that favor certain groups. These pitfalls remain independent of group distributions in datasets and require differentiated analysis of target groups.