Recent years have witnessed significant success in Self-Supervised Learning (SSL), which facilitates various downstream tasks. However, attackers may steal such SSL models and commercialize them for profit, making it crucial to protect their Intellectual Property (IP). Most existing IP protection solutions are designed for supervised learning models and cannot be used directly since they require that the models' downstream tasks and target labels be known and available during watermark embedding, which is not always possible in the domain of SSL. To address such a problem especially when downstream tasks are diverse and unknown during watermark embedding, we propose a novel black-box watermarking solution, named SSL-WM, for protecting the ownership of SSL models. SSL-WM maps watermarked inputs by the watermarked encoders into an invariant representation space, which causes any downstream classifiers to produce expected behavior, thus allowing the detection of embedded watermarks. We evaluate SSL-WM on numerous tasks, such as Computer Vision (CV) and Natural Language Processing (NLP), using different SSL models, including contrastive-based and generative-based. Experimental results demonstrate that SSL-WM can effectively verify the ownership of stolen SSL models in various downstream tasks. Furthermore, SSL-WM is robust against model fine-tuning and pruning attacks. Lastly, SSL-WM can also evade detection from evaluated watermark detection approaches, demonstrating its promising application in protecting the IP of SSL models.
In supervised machine learning, use of correct labels is extremely important to ensure high accuracy. Unfortunately, most datasets contain corrupted labels. Machine learning models trained on such datasets do not generalize well. Thus, detecting their label errors can significantly increase their efficacy. We propose a novel framework, called CTRL (Clustering TRaining Losses for label error detection), to detect label errors in multi-class datasets. It detects label errors in two steps based on the observation that models learn clean and noisy labels in different ways. First, we train a neural network using the noisy training dataset and obtain the loss curve for each sample. Then, we apply clustering algorithms to the training losses to group samples into two categories: cleanly-labeled and noisily-labeled. After label error detection, we remove samples with noisy labels and retrain the model. Our experimental results demonstrate state-of-the-art error detection accuracy on both image (CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100) and tabular datasets under simulated noise. We also use a theoretical analysis to provide insights into why CTRL performs so well.
With the broad application of deep neural networks (DNNs), backdoor attacks have gradually attracted attention. Backdoor attacks are insidious, and poisoned models perform well on benign samples and are only triggered when given specific inputs, which cause the neural network to produce incorrect outputs. The state-of-the-art backdoor attack work is implemented by data poisoning, i.e., the attacker injects poisoned samples into the dataset, and the models trained with that dataset are infected with the backdoor. However, most of the triggers used in the current study are fixed patterns patched on a small fraction of an image and are often clearly mislabeled, which is easily detected by humans or defense methods such as Neural Cleanse and SentiNet. Also, it's difficult to be learned by DNNs without mislabeling, as they may ignore small patterns. In this paper, we propose a generalized backdoor attack method based on the frequency domain, which can implement backdoor implantation without mislabeling and accessing the training process. It is invisible to human beings and able to evade the commonly used defense methods. We evaluate our approach in the no-label and clean-label cases on three datasets (CIFAR-10, STL-10, and GTSRB) with two popular scenarios (self-supervised learning and supervised learning). The results show our approach can achieve a high attack success rate (above 90%) on all the tasks without significant performance degradation on main tasks. Also, we evaluate the bypass performance of our approach for different kinds of defenses, including the detection of training data (i.e., Activation Clustering), the preprocessing of inputs (i.e., Filtering), the detection of inputs (i.e., SentiNet), and the detection of models (i.e., Neural Cleanse). The experimental results demonstrate that our approach shows excellent robustness to such defenses.