Are Video Models Zero-Shot Learners and Reasoners in Education? EduVideoBench, A Knowledge-Skills-Attitude Benchmark for Educational Video Generation

Video generation models (VGMs) are rapidly entering classrooms, yet existing benchmarks evaluate only perceptual quality, intrinsic faithfulness, generic safety, or video as a reasoning medium, and none assesses whether the outputs are educationally valid. In this work, we present EduVideoBench, the first balanced benchmark in the education domain, grounded in the Knowledge-Skills-Attitude (KSA) framework so that pedagogical adequacy and educational safety are evaluated jointly rather than as ad-hoc quality dimensions. Across five frontier VGMs, our results show substantial room for improvement across knowledge, skills, and attitude before they are classroom-ready. We complement this with a qualitative analysis of expert comments, finding that educational validity is multi-component, where a single misaligned element such as pacing, legibility, or notation can invalidate an otherwise correct video. We hope EduVideoBench will guide the development of VGMs that are pedagogically grounded and safe for the classroom.

ReGraM: Region-First Knowledge Graph Reasoning for Medical Question Answering

Recent studies in medical question answering (Medical QA) have actively explored the integration of large language models (LLMs) with biomedical knowledge graphs (KGs) to improve factual accuracy. However, most existing approaches still rely on traversing the entire KG or performing large-scale retrieval, which introduces substantial noise and leads to unstable multi-hop reasoning. We argue that the core challenge lies not in expanding access to knowledge, but in identifying and reasoning over the appropriate subset of evidence for each query. ReGraM is a region-first knowledge graph reasoning framework that addresses this challenge by constructing a query-aligned subgraph and performing stepwise reasoning constrained to this localized region under multiple evidence aware modes. By focusing inference on only the most relevant portion of the KG, ReGraM departs from the assumption that all relations are equally useful an assumption that rarely holds in domain-specific medical settings. Experiments on seven medical QA benchmarks demonstrate that ReGraM consistently outperforms a strong baseline (KGARevion), achieving an 8.04% absolute accuracy gain on MCQ, a 4.50% gain on SAQ, and a 42.9% reduction in hallucination rate. Ablation and qualitative analyses further show that aligning region construction with hop-wise reasoning is the primary driver of these improvements. Overall, our results highlight region-first KG reasoning as an effective paradigm for improving factual accuracy and consistency in medical QA.