Learning to optimize with guarantees: a complete characterization of linearly convergent algorithms

In high-stakes engineering applications, optimization algorithms must come with provable worst-case guarantees over a mathematically defined class of problems. Designing for the worst case, however, inevitably sacrifices performance on the specific problem instances that often occur in practice. We address the problem of augmenting a given linearly convergent algorithm to improve its average-case performance on a restricted set of target problems - for example, tailoring an off-the-shelf solver for model predictive control (MPC) for an application to a specific dynamical system - while preserving its worst-case guarantees across the entire problem class. Toward this goal, we characterize the class of algorithms that achieve linear convergence for classes of nonsmooth composite optimization problems. In particular, starting from a baseline linearly convergent algorithm, we derive all - and only - the modifications to its update rule that maintain its convergence properties. Our results apply to augmenting legacy algorithms such as gradient descent for nonconvex, gradient-dominated functions; Nesterov's accelerated method for strongly convex functions; and projected methods for optimization over polyhedral feasibility sets. We showcase effectiveness of the approach on solving optimization problems with tight iteration budgets in application to ill-conditioned systems of linear equations and MPC for linear systems.

MAD: A Magnitude And Direction Policy Parametrization for Stability Constrained Reinforcement Learning

We introduce magnitude and direction (MAD) policies, a policy parameterization for reinforcement learning (RL) that preserves Lp closed-loop stability for nonlinear dynamical systems. Although complete in their ability to describe all stabilizing controllers, methods based on nonlinear Youla and system-level synthesis are significantly affected by the difficulty of parameterizing Lp-stable operators. In contrast, MAD policies introduce explicit feedback on state-dependent features - a key element behind the success of RL pipelines - without compromising closed-loop stability. This is achieved by describing the magnitude of the control input with a disturbance-feedback Lp-stable operator, while selecting its direction based on state-dependent features through a universal function approximator. We further characterize the robust stability properties of MAD policies under model mismatch. Unlike existing disturbance-feedback policy parameterizations, MAD policies introduce state-feedback components compatible with model-free RL pipelines, ensuring closed-loop stability without requiring model information beyond open-loop stability. Numerical experiments show that MAD policies trained with deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG) methods generalize to unseen scenarios, matching the performance of standard neural network policies while guaranteeing closed-loop stability by design.

Learning to optimize with convergence guarantees using nonlinear system theory

The increasing reliance on numerical methods for controlling dynamical systems and training machine learning models underscores the need to devise algorithms that dependably and efficiently navigate complex optimization landscapes. Classical gradient descent methods offer strong theoretical guarantees for convex problems; however, they demand meticulous hyperparameter tuning for non-convex ones. The emerging paradigm of learning to optimize (L2O) automates the discovery of algorithms with optimized performance leveraging learning models and data - yet, it lacks a theoretical framework to analyze convergence and robustness of the learned algorithms. In this paper, we fill this gap by harnessing nonlinear system theory. Specifically, we propose an unconstrained parametrization of all convergent algorithms for smooth non-convex objective functions. Notably, our framework is directly compatible with automatic differentiation tools, ensuring convergence by design while learning to optimize.

Follow the Clairvoyant: an Imitation Learning Approach to Optimal Control

We consider control of dynamical systems through the lens of competitive analysis. Most prior work in this area focuses on minimizing regret, that is, the loss relative to an ideal clairvoyant policy that has noncausal access to past, present, and future disturbances. Motivated by the observation that the optimal cost only provides coarse information about the ideal closed-loop behavior, we instead propose directly minimizing the tracking error relative to the optimal trajectories in hindsight, i.e., imitating the clairvoyant policy. By embracing a system level perspective, we present an efficient optimization-based approach for computing follow-the-clairvoyant (FTC) safe controllers. We prove that these attain minimal regret if no constraints are imposed on the noncausal benchmark. In addition, we present numerical experiments to show that our policy retains the hallmark of competitive algorithms of interpolating between classical $\mathcal{H}_2$ and $\mathcal{H}_\infty$ control laws - while consistently outperforming regret minimization methods in constrained scenarios thanks to the superior ability to chase the clairvoyant.