Estimation of conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) is an important topic in various fields such as medical and social sciences. CATEs can be estimated with high accuracy if distributed data across multiple parties can be centralized. However, it is difficult to aggregate such data if they contain privacy information. To address this issue, we proposed data collaboration double machine learning (DC-DML), a method that can estimate CATE models with privacy preservation of distributed data, and evaluated the method through numerical experiments. Our contributions are summarized in the following three points. First, our method enables estimation and testing of semi-parametric CATE models without iterative communication on distributed data. Semi-parametric or non-parametric CATE models enable estimation and testing that is more robust to model mis-specification than parametric models. However, to our knowledge, no communication-efficient method has been proposed for estimating and testing semi-parametric or non-parametric CATE models on distributed data. Second, our method enables collaborative estimation between different parties as well as multiple time points because the dimensionality-reduced intermediate representations can be accumulated. Third, our method performed as well or better than other methods in evaluation experiments using synthetic, semi-synthetic and real-world datasets.
Given the time and expense associated with bringing a drug to market, numerous studies have been conducted to predict the properties of compounds based on their structure using machine learning. Federated learning has been applied to compound datasets to increase their prediction accuracy while safeguarding potentially proprietary information. However, federated learning is encumbered by low accuracy in not identically and independently distributed (non-IID) settings, i.e., data partitioning has a large label bias, and is considered unsuitable for compound datasets, which tend to have large label bias. To address this limitation, we utilized an alternative method of distributed machine learning to chemical compound data from open sources, called data collaboration analysis (DC). We also proposed data collaboration analysis using projection data (DCPd), which is an improved method that utilizes auxiliary PubChem data. This improves the quality of individual user-side data transformations for the projection data for the creation of intermediate representations. The classification accuracy, i.e., area under the curve in the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) and AUC in the precision-recall curve (PR-AUC), of federated averaging (FedAvg), DC, and DCPd was compared for five compound datasets. We determined that the machine learning performance for non-IID settings was in the order of DCPd, DC, and FedAvg, although they were almost the same in identically and independently distributed (IID) settings. Moreover, the results showed that compared to other methods, DCPd exhibited a negligible decline in classification accuracy in experiments with different degrees of label bias. Thus, DCPd can address the low performance in non-IID settings, which is one of the challenges of federated learning.
Transparency of Machine Learning models used for decision support in various industries becomes essential for ensuring their ethical use. To that end, feature attribution methods such as SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) are widely used to explain the predictions of black-box machine learning models to customers and developers. However, a parallel trend has been to train machine learning models in collaboration with other data holders without accessing their data. Such models, trained over horizontally or vertically partitioned data, present a challenge for explainable AI because the explaining party may have a biased view of background data or a partial view of the feature space. As a result, explanations obtained from different participants of distributed machine learning might not be consistent with one another, undermining trust in the product. This paper presents an Explainable Data Collaboration Framework based on a model-agnostic additive feature attribution algorithm (KernelSHAP) and Data Collaboration method of privacy-preserving distributed machine learning. In particular, we present three algorithms for different scenarios of explainability in Data Collaboration and verify their consistency with experiments on open-access datasets. Our results demonstrated a significant (by at least a factor of 1.75) decrease in feature attribution discrepancies among the users of distributed machine learning.
Multi-source data fusion, in which multiple data sources are jointly analyzed to obtain improved information, has considerable research attention. For the datasets of multiple medical institutions, data confidentiality and cross-institutional communication are critical. In such cases, data collaboration (DC) analysis by sharing dimensionality-reduced intermediate representations without iterative cross-institutional communications may be appropriate. Identifiability of the shared data is essential when analyzing data including personal information. In this study, the identifiability of the DC analysis is investigated. The results reveals that the shared intermediate representations are readily identifiable to the original data for supervised learning. This study then proposes a non-readily identifiable DC analysis only sharing non-readily identifiable data for multiple medical datasets including personal information. The proposed method solves identifiability concerns based on a random sample permutation, the concept of interpretable DC analysis, and usage of functions that cannot be reconstructed. In numerical experiments on medical datasets, the proposed method exhibits a non-readily identifiability while maintaining a high recognition performance of the conventional DC analysis. For a hospital dataset, the proposed method exhibits a nine percentage point improvement regarding the recognition performance over the local analysis that uses only local dataset.
Recently, data collaboration (DC) analysis has been developed for privacy-preserving integrated analysis across multiple institutions. DC analysis centralizes individually constructed dimensionality-reduced intermediate representations and realizes integrated analysis via collaboration representations without sharing the original data. To construct the collaboration representations, each institution generates and shares a shareable anchor dataset and centralizes its intermediate representation. Although, random anchor dataset functions well for DC analysis in general, using an anchor dataset whose distribution is close to that of the raw dataset is expected to improve the recognition performance, particularly for the interpretable DC analysis. Based on an extension of the synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE), this study proposes an anchor data construction technique to improve the recognition performance without increasing the risk of data leakage. Numerical results demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed SMOTE-based method over the existing anchor data constructions for artificial and real-world datasets. Specifically, the proposed method achieves 9 percentage point and 38 percentage point performance improvements regarding accuracy and essential feature selection, respectively, over existing methods for an income dataset. The proposed method provides another use of SMOTE not for imbalanced data classifications but for a key technology of privacy-preserving integrated analysis.
The development of technologies for causal inference with the privacy preservation of distributed data has attracted considerable attention in recent years. To address this issue, we propose a quasi-experiment based on data collaboration (DC-QE) that enables causal inference from distributed data with privacy preservation. Our method preserves the privacy of private data by sharing only dimensionality-reduced intermediate representations, which are individually constructed by each party. Moreover, our method can reduce both random errors and biases, whereas existing methods can only reduce random errors in the estimation of treatment effects. Through numerical experiments on both artificial and real-world data, we confirmed that our method can lead to better estimation results than individual analyses. With the spread of our method, intermediate representations can be published as open data to help researchers find causalities and accumulated as a knowledge base.
The growing amount of data and advances in data science have created a need for a new kind of cloud platform that provides users with flexibility, strong security, and the ability to couple with supercomputers and edge devices through high-performance networks. We have built such a nation-wide cloud platform, called "mdx" to meet this need. The mdx platform's virtualization service, jointly operated by 9 national universities and 2 national research institutes in Japan, launched in 2021, and more features are in development. Currently mdx is used by researchers in a wide variety of domains, including materials informatics, geo-spatial information science, life science, astronomical science, economics, social science, and computer science. This paper provides an the overview of the mdx platform, details the motivation for its development, reports its current status, and outlines its future plans.
Ensemble clustering is a fundamental problem in the machine learning field, combining multiple base clusterings into a better clustering result. However, most of the existing methods are unsuitable for large-scale ensemble clustering tasks due to the efficiency bottleneck. In this paper, we propose a large-scale spectral ensemble clustering (LSEC) method to strike a good balance between efficiency and effectiveness. In LSEC, a large-scale spectral clustering based efficient ensemble generation framework is designed to generate various base clusterings within a low computational complexity. Then all based clustering are combined through a bipartite graph partition based consensus function into a better consensus clustering result. The LSEC method achieves a lower computational complexity than most existing ensemble clustering methods. Experiments conducted on ten large-scale datasets show the efficiency and effectiveness of the LSEC method. The MATLAB code of the proposed method and experimental datasets are available at https://github.com/Li- Hongmin/MyPaperWithCode.
Spectral clustering is one of the most popular clustering methods. However, how to balance the efficiency and effectiveness of the large-scale spectral clustering with limited computing resources has not been properly solved for a long time. In this paper, we propose a divide-and-conquer based large-scale spectral clustering method to strike a good balance between efficiency and effectiveness. In the proposed method, a divide-and-conquer based landmark selection algorithm and a novel approximate similarity matrix approach are designed to construct a sparse similarity matrix within extremely low cost. Then clustering results can be computed quickly through a bipartite graph partition process. The proposed method achieves the lower computational complexity than most existing large-scale spectral clustering. Experimental results on ten large-scale datasets have demonstrated the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed methods. The MATLAB code of the proposed method and experimental datasets are available at https://github.com/Li-Hongmin/MyPaperWithCode.
Distributed data analysis without revealing the individual data has recently attracted significant attention in several applications. A collaborative data analysis through sharing dimensionality reduced representations of data has been proposed as a non-model sharing-type federated learning. This paper analyzes the accuracy and privacy evaluations of this novel framework. In the accuracy analysis, we provided sufficient conditions for the equivalence of the collaborative data analysis and the centralized analysis with dimensionality reduction. In the privacy analysis, we proved that collaborative users' private datasets are protected with a double privacy layer against insider and external attacking scenarios.