Association of Progressive PPFE and Mortality in Lung Cancer Screening Cohorts

Background: Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) is an upper lobe predominant fibrotic lung abnormality associated with increased mortality in established interstitial lung disease. However, the clinical significance of radiologic PPFE progression in lung cancer screening (LCS) populations remains unclear. Methods: We analysed longitudinal low-dose CT scans and clinical data from two LCS studies: National Lung Screening Trial (NLST; n=7,980); SUMMIT study (n=8,561). An automated algorithm quantified PPFE volume on baseline and follow-up scans. Annualised change in PPFE was derived and dichotomised using a distribution-based threshold to define progressive PPFE. Associations between progressive PPFE and mortality were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for demographic and clinical variables. In SUMMIT cohort, associations between progressive PPFE and clinical outcomes were assessed using incidence rate ratios (IRR) and odds ratios (OR). Findings: Progressive PPFE independently associated with mortality in both LCS cohorts (NLST: Hazard Ratio (HR)=1.25, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.01--1.56, p=0.042; SUMMIT: HR=3.14, 95% CI: 1.66--5.97, p<0.001). Within SUMMIT, progressive PPFE was strongly associated with higher respiratory admissions (IRR=2.79, p<0.001), increased antibiotic and steroid use (IRR=1.55, p=0.010), and showed a trend towards higher modified medical research council scores (OR=1.40, p=0.055). Interpretation: Radiologic PPFE progression independently associates with mortality across two large LCS cohorts, and associates with adverse clinical outcomes. Quantitative assessment of PPFE progression may provide a clinically relevant imaging biomarker to identify individuals at increased risk of respiratory morbidity within LCS programmes.

Association of Radiologic PPFE Change with Mortality in Lung Cancer Screening Cohorts

Background: Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) is an upper lobe predominant fibrotic lung abnormality associated with increased mortality in established interstitial lung disease. However, the clinical significance of radiologic PPFE progression in lung cancer screening populations remains unclear. We investigated whether longitudinal change in PPFE quantified on low dose CT independently associates with mortality and respiratory morbidity. Methods: We analysed longitudinal low-dose CT scans and clinical data from two lung cancer screening studies: the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST; n=7980) and the SUMMIT study (n=8561). An automated algorithm quantified PPFE volume on baseline and follow up scans. Annualised change in PPFE (dPPFE) was derived and dichotomised using a distribution based threshold to define progressive PPFE. Associations between dPPFE and mortality were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for demographic and clinical variables. In the SUMMIT cohort, dPPFE was also examined in relation to clinical outcomes. Findings: dPPFE independently associated with mortality in both cohorts (NLST: HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.56, p=0.042; SUMMIT: HR 3.14, 95% CI 1.66-5.97, p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves showed reduced survival among participants with progressive PPFE in both cohorts. In SUMMIT, dPPFE was associated with higher respiratory admissions (IRR 2.79, p<0.001), increased antibiotic and steroid use (IRR 1.55, p=0.010), and a trend towards higher mMRC scores (OR 1.40, p=0.055). Interpretation: Radiologic PPFE progression independently associates with mortality across two large lung cancer screening cohorts and with adverse clinical outcomes. Quantitative assessment of PPFE progression may provide a clinically relevant imaging biomarker for identifying individuals at increased respiratory risk within screening programmes.

Review of multimodal machine learning approaches in healthcare

Machine learning methods in healthcare have traditionally focused on using data from a single modality, limiting their ability to effectively replicate the clinical practice of integrating multiple sources of information for improved decision making. Clinicians typically rely on a variety of data sources including patients' demographic information, laboratory data, vital signs and various imaging data modalities to make informed decisions and contextualise their findings. Recent advances in machine learning have facilitated the more efficient incorporation of multimodal data, resulting in applications that better represent the clinician's approach. Here, we provide a review of multimodal machine learning approaches in healthcare, offering a comprehensive overview of recent literature. We discuss the various data modalities used in clinical diagnosis, with a particular emphasis on imaging data. We evaluate fusion techniques, explore existing multimodal datasets and examine common training strategies.