RDMA over Converged Ethernet (RoCE) has gained significant attraction for datacenter networks due to its compatibility with conventional Ethernet-based fabric. However, the RDMA protocol is efficient only on (nearly) lossless networks, emphasizing the vital role of congestion control on RoCE networks. Unfortunately, the native RoCE congestion control scheme, based on Priority Flow Control (PFC), suffers from many drawbacks such as unfairness, head-of-line-blocking, and deadlock. Therefore, in recent years many schemes have been proposed to provide additional congestion control for RoCE networks to minimize PFC drawbacks. However, these schemes are proposed for general datacenter environments. In contrast to the general datacenters that are built using commodity hardware and run general-purpose workloads, high-performance distributed training platforms deploy high-end accelerators and network components and exclusively run training workloads using collectives (All-Reduce, All-To-All) communication libraries for communication. Furthermore, these platforms usually have a private network, separating their communication traffic from the rest of the datacenter traffic. Scalable topology-aware collective algorithms are inherently designed to avoid incast patterns and balance traffic optimally. These distinct features necessitate revisiting previously proposed congestion control schemes for general-purpose datacenter environments. In this paper, we thoroughly analyze some of the SOTA RoCE congestion control schemes vs. PFC when running on distributed training platforms. Our results indicate that previously proposed RoCE congestion control schemes have little impact on the end-to-end performance of training workloads, motivating the necessity of designing an optimized, yet low-overhead, congestion control scheme based on the characteristics of distributed training platforms and workloads.