We consider the safe reinforcement learning (RL) problem of maximizing utility while satisfying provided constraints. Since we do not assume any prior knowledge or pre-training of the safety concept, we are interested in asymptotic constraint satisfaction. A popular approach in this line of research is to combine the Lagrangian method with a model-free RL algorithm to adjust the weight of the constraint reward dynamically. It relies on a single policy to handle the conflict between utility and constraint rewards, which is often challenging. Inspired by the safety layer design (Dalal et al., 2018), we propose to separately learn a safety editor policy that transforms potentially unsafe actions output by a utility maximizer policy into safe ones. The safety editor is trained to maximize the constraint reward while minimizing a hinge loss of the utility Q values of actions before and after the edit. On 12 custom Safety Gym (Ray et al., 2019) tasks and 2 safe racing tasks with very harsh constraint thresholds, our approach demonstrates outstanding utility performance while complying with the constraints. Ablation studies reveal that our two-policy design is critical. Simply doubling the model capacity of typical single-policy approaches will not lead to comparable results. The Q hinge loss is also important in certain circumstances, and replacing it with the usual L2 distance could fail badly.