Human mental processes allow for qualitative reasoning about causality in terms of mechanistic relations of the variables of interest, which we argue are naturally described by structural causal model (SCM). Since interpretations are being derived from mental models, the same applies for SCM. By defining a metric space on SCM, we provide a theoretical perspective on the comparison of mental models and thereby conclude that interpretations can be used for guiding a learning system towards true causality. To this effect, we present a theoretical analysis from first principles that results in a human-readable interpretation scheme consistent with the provided causality that we name structural causal interpretations (SCI). Going further, we prove that any existing neural induction method (NIM) is in fact interpretable. Our first experiment (E1) assesses the quality of such NIM-based SCI. In (E2) we observe evidence for our conjecture on improved sample-efficiency for SCI-based learning. After conducting a small user study, in (E3) we observe superiority in human-based over NIM-based SCI in support of our initial hypothesis.