Alert button

Extract and Edit: An Alternative to Back-Translation for Unsupervised Neural Machine Translation

Apr 04, 2019
Jiawei Wu, Xin Wang, William Yang Wang

Figure 1 for Extract and Edit: An Alternative to Back-Translation for Unsupervised Neural Machine Translation
Figure 2 for Extract and Edit: An Alternative to Back-Translation for Unsupervised Neural Machine Translation
Figure 3 for Extract and Edit: An Alternative to Back-Translation for Unsupervised Neural Machine Translation
Figure 4 for Extract and Edit: An Alternative to Back-Translation for Unsupervised Neural Machine Translation

Share this with someone who'll enjoy it:

The overreliance on large parallel corpora significantly limits the applicability of machine translation systems to the majority of language pairs. Back-translation has been dominantly used in previous approaches for unsupervised neural machine translation, where pseudo sentence pairs are generated to train the models with a reconstruction loss. However, the pseudo sentences are usually of low quality as translation errors accumulate during training. To avoid this fundamental issue, we propose an alternative but more effective approach, extract-edit, to extract and then edit real sentences from the target monolingual corpora. Furthermore, we introduce a comparative translation loss to evaluate the translated target sentences and thus train the unsupervised translation systems. Experiments show that the proposed approach consistently outperforms the previous state-of-the-art unsupervised machine translation systems across two benchmarks (English-French and English-German) and two low-resource language pairs (English-Romanian and English-Russian) by more than 2 (up to 3.63) BLEU points.

* 11 pages, 3 figures. Accepted to NAACL 2019  
View paper onarxiv icon

Share this with someone who'll enjoy it: