Abstract:Recent studies have made great progress in functional brain network classification by modeling the brain as a network of Regions of Interest (ROIs) and leveraging their connections to understand brain functionality and diagnose mental disorders. Various deep learning architectures, including Convolutional Neural Networks, Graph Neural Networks, and the recent Transformer, have been developed. However, despite the increasing complexity of these models, the performance gain has not been as salient. This raises a question: Does increasing model complexity necessarily lead to higher classification accuracy? In this paper, we revisit the simplest deep learning architecture, the Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), and propose a pure MLP-based method, named BrainNetMLP, for functional brain network classification, which capitalizes on the advantages of MLP, including efficient computation and fewer parameters. Moreover, BrainNetMLP incorporates a dual-branch structure to jointly capture both spatial connectivity and spectral information, enabling precise spatiotemporal feature fusion. We evaluate our proposed BrainNetMLP on two public and popular brain network classification datasets, the Human Connectome Project (HCP) and the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange (ABIDE). Experimental results demonstrate pure MLP-based methods can achieve state-of-the-art performance, revealing the potential of MLP-based models as more efficient yet effective alternatives in functional brain network classification. The code will be available at https://github.com/JayceonHo/BrainNetMLP.
Abstract:The WWW 2025 EReL@MIR Workshop Multimodal CTR Prediction Challenge focuses on effectively applying multimodal embedding features to improve click-through rate (CTR) prediction in recommender systems. This technical report presents our 1$^{st}$ place winning solution for Task 2, combining sequential modeling and feature interaction learning to effectively capture user-item interactions. For multimodal information integration, we simply append the frozen multimodal embeddings to each item embedding. Experiments on the challenge dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, achieving superior performance with a 0.9839 AUC on the leaderboard, much higher than the baseline model. Code and configuration are available in our GitHub repository and the checkpoint of our model can be found in HuggingFace.
Abstract:As irregularly structured data representations, graphs have received a large amount of attention in recent years and have been widely applied to various real-world scenarios such as social, traffic, and energy settings. Compared to non-graph algorithms, numerous graph-based methodologies benefited from the strong power of graphs for representing high-dimensional and non-Euclidean data. In the field of Graph Signal Processing (GSP), analogies of classical signal processing concepts, such as shifting, convolution, filtering, and transformations are developed. However, many GSP techniques usually postulate the graph is static in both signal and typology. This assumption hinders the effectiveness of GSP methodologies as the assumption ignores the time-varying properties in numerous real-world systems. For example, in the traffic network, the signal on each node varies over time and contains underlying temporal correlation and patterns worthy of analysis. To tackle this challenge, more and more work are being done recently to investigate the processing of time-varying graph signals. They cope with time-varying challenges from three main directions: 1) graph time-spectral filtering, 2) multi-variate time-series forecasting, and 3) spatiotemporal graph data mining by neural networks, where non-negligible progress has been achieved. Despite the success of signal processing and learning over time-varying graphs, there is no survey to compare and conclude the current methodology for GSP and graph learning. To compensate for this, in this paper, we aim to review the development and recent progress on signal processing and learning over time-varying graphs, and compare their advantages and disadvantages from both the methodological and experimental side, to outline the challenges and potential research directions for future research.