Better heads do not guarantee better binarized constituency parsing

We revisit punctuation-aware tree binarization for constituency parsing and ask whether dependency-induced headedness improves binary parser supervision. Although learned heads substantially outperform rule-based heads in intrinsic head prediction, they do not yield consistent parsing gains after debinarization. In particular, punctuation-conditioned evaluation shows that learned headedness underperforms rule-based binarization in macro-average punctuation-sensitive $F_1$, despite a small overall gain on CTB. Similar instability appears under cross-treebank transfer. These results suggest that \ycc{linguistically grounded} headedness is not necessarily parser-optimal when used as a binarization control signal. The paper presents a negative result: better head prediction does not imply better punctuation-sensitive constituency parsing.

Learning Constituent Headedness

Headedness is widely used as an organizing device in syntactic analysis, yet constituency treebanks rarely encode it explicitly and most processing pipelines recover it procedurally via percolation rules. We treat this notion of constituent headedness as an explicit representational layer and learn it as a supervised prediction task over aligned constituency and dependency annotations, inducing supervision by defining each constituent head as the dependency span head. On aligned English and Chinese data, the resulting models achieve near-ceiling intrinsic accuracy and substantially outperform Collins-style rule-based percolation. Predicted heads yield comparable parsing accuracy under head-driven binarization, consistent with the induced binary training targets being largely equivalent across head choices, while increasing the fidelity of deterministic constituency-to-dependency conversion and transferring across resources and languages under simple label-mapping interfaces.