LLM-as-a-Judge for Reliable and Explainable Offline Evaluation in Top-K Recommendation

Recommendation evaluation plays a crucial role in guiding the refinement and deployment of recommender systems. Most existing trials rely on offline evaluation using Top-K metrics computed over holdout user behaviors. However, we identify two fundamental limitations that undermine their ability to deliver reliable and explainable evaluations. Regarding reliability, offline evaluation treats observed user feedback as a proxy of true preferences and enforces rigid ID matching between the proxy and recommendation. In practice, feedback collections are inherently shaped by incomplete and biased item exposure, leading to distorted and unreliable assessments. Regarding explainability, Top-K metrics only establish numerical scores without offering meaningful insights to support them, thereby reinforcing the black-box nature of offline evaluation. In this paper, we propose a reliable and explainable LLM-as-a-Judge framework for offline recommendation evaluation. To enhance reliability, we introduce a semantic proxy from user textual behaviors to represent their true preferences. This proxy allows for more flexible matching between preferences and recommendations in the semantic space, rather than depending on the holdout feedback. To ensure explainability, the LLM Judge adopts a reasoning-then-scoring process to generate relevance judgments along with explicit rationale. Finally, we aggregate the individual scores into global Top-K metrics to quantify overall recommendation quality, and provide justification for each preference hit or miss. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the LLM Judge achieves solid reliability, explainability, and robustness in evaluation.

Causality-aware Graph Aggregation Weight Estimator for Popularity Debiasing in Top-K Recommendation

Graph-based recommender systems leverage neighborhood aggregation to generate node representations, which is highly sensitive to popularity bias, resulting in an echo effect during information propagation. Existing graph-based debiasing solutions refine the aggregation process with attempts such as edge reconstruction or weight adjustment. However, these methods remain inadequate in fully alleviating popularity bias. Specifically, this is because 1) they provide no insights into graph aggregation rationality, thus lacking an optimality guarantee; 2) they fail to well balance the training and debiasing process, which undermines the effectiveness. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to mitigate popularity bias through rational modeling of the graph aggregation process. We reveal that graph aggregation is a special form of backdoor adjustment in causal inference, where the aggregation weight corresponds to the historical interaction likelihood distribution. Based on this insight, we devise an encoder-decoder architecture, namely Causality-aware Graph Aggregation Weight Estimator for Debiasing (CAGED), to approximate the unbiased aggregation weight by optimizing the evidence lower bound of the interaction likelihood. In order to enhance the debiasing effectiveness during early training stages, we further design a momentum update strategy that incrementally refines the aggregation weight matrix. Extensive experiments on three datasets demonstrate that CAGED outperforms existing graph-based debiasing methods. Our implementation is available at https://github.com/QueYork/CAGED.