Abstract:We introduce VidPair-Halluc, a new benchmark for evaluating video hallucination in large video models (LVMs) under rigorous and controlled conditions. Unlike previous benchmarks that primarily rely on text-based perturbations or adversarial questions while neglecting the consistency of visual backgrounds, VidPair-Halluc features video pairs with highly similar backgrounds but distinctly different foreground semantics, enabling precise attribution of model errors to genuine hallucination rather than background variation. The benchmark is constructed through PairFlow, a pipeline that leverages recent advances in text-to-image and video generation to systematically compose stories, generate coherent video clips, and assemble them into adversarial pairs. Covering both spatial and temporal reasoning across ten semantic aspects, VidPair-Halluc comprises 1K high-quality adversarial video pairs and 11K spatio-temporal QA pairs with control over background and foreground variations. Evaluations on mainstream LVMs show persistent difficulty with robust fine-grained video understanding in adversarial settings, and code and data are available at the https://jethrojames.github.io/VidPair-Halluc/.
Abstract:Despite rapid progress in multimodal large language models (MLLMs), their capability for deep emotional understanding remains limited. We argue that genuine affective intelligence requires explicit modeling of Theory of Mind (ToM), the cognitive substrate from which emotions arise. To this end, we introduce HitEmotion, a ToM-grounded hierarchical benchmark that diagnoses capability breakpoints across increasing levels of cognitive depth. Second, we propose a ToM-guided reasoning chain that tracks mental states and calibrates cross-modal evidence to achieve faithful emotional reasoning. We further introduce TMPO, a reinforcement learning method that uses intermediate mental states as process-level supervision to guide and strengthen model reasoning. Extensive experiments show that HitEmotion exposes deep emotional reasoning deficits in state-of-the-art models, especially on cognitively demanding tasks. In evaluation, the ToM-guided reasoning chain and TMPO improve end-task accuracy and yield more faithful, more coherent rationales. In conclusion, our work provides the research community with a practical toolkit for evaluating and enhancing the cognition-based emotional understanding capabilities of MLLMs. Our dataset and code are available at: https://HitEmotion.github.io/.
Abstract:Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) face a fundamental dilemma in video reasoning: they are caught between the prohibitive computational costs of verbose reasoning and the hallucination risks of efficient, ungrounded approaches. To resolve this, we introduce the Chain of Evidence (CoE), a novel framework that architecturally decouples and co-optimizes perceptual grounding and reasoning efficiency. CoE incorporates two core innovations: (1) A lightweight Evidence Grounding Module (EGM) that acts as a query-guided filter, dynamically identifying and extracting a compact set of high-fidelity visual evidence; and (2) An Evidence-Anchoring Protocol optimized via Reinforcement Learning. Crucially, we design a composite reward mechanism that enforces process alignment, compelling the model to strictly reference identified temporal anchors during deduction, thereby mitigating hallucinations. To enable this, we construct CoE-Instruct, a large-scale dataset (164k samples) featuring a novel dual-annotation schema for separate perception and reasoning supervision. Extensive experiments on five benchmarks, including Video-MME, MVBench, and VSI-Bench, demonstrate that CoE-enhanced models establish a new state-of-the-art. They significantly outperform existing methods in accuracy, proving CoE to be a powerful and practical paradigm for reliable video understanding.