An In-Depth Study of Filter-Agnostic Vector Search on a PostgreSQL Database System: [Experiments and Analysis]

Filtered Vector Search (FVS) is critical for supporting semantic search and GenAI applications in modern database systems. However, existing research most often evaluates algorithms in specialized libraries, making optimistic assumptions that do not align with enterprise-grade database systems. Our work challenges this premise by demonstrating that in a production-grade database system, commonly made assumptions do not hold, leading to performance characteristics and algorithmic trade-offs that are fundamentally different from those observed in isolated library settings. This paper presents the first in-depth analysis of filter-agnostic FVS algorithms within a production PostgreSQL-compatible system. We systematically evaluate post-filtering and inline-filtering strategies across a wide range of selectivities and correlations. Our central finding is that the optimal algorithm is not dictated by the cost of distance computations alone, but that system-level overheads that come from both distance computations and filter operations (like page accesses and data retrieval) play a significant role. We demonstrate that graph-based approaches (such as NaviX/ACORN) can incur prohibitive numbers of filter checks and system-level overheads, compared with clustering-based indexes such as ScaNN, often canceling out their theoretical benefits in real-world database environments. Ultimately, our findings provide the database community with crucial insights and practical guidelines, demonstrating that the optimal choice for a filter-agnostic FVS algorithm is not absolute, but rather a system-aware decision contingent on the interplay between workload characteristics and the underlying costs of data access in a real-world database architecture.

CardBench: A Benchmark for Learned Cardinality Estimation in Relational Databases

Cardinality estimation is crucial for enabling high query performance in relational databases. Recently learned cardinality estimation models have been proposed to improve accuracy but there is no systematic benchmark or datasets which allows researchers to evaluate the progress made by new learned approaches and even systematically develop new learned approaches. In this paper, we are releasing a benchmark, containing thousands of queries over 20 distinct real-world databases for learned cardinality estimation. In contrast to other initial benchmarks, our benchmark is much more diverse and can be used for training and testing learned models systematically. Using this benchmark, we explored whether learned cardinality estimation can be transferred to an unseen dataset in a zero-shot manner. We trained GNN-based and transformer-based models to study the problem in three setups: 1-) instance-based, 2-) zero-shot, and 3-) fine-tuned. Our results show that while we get promising results for zero-shot cardinality estimation on simple single table queries; as soon as we add joins, the accuracy drops. However, we show that with fine-tuning, we can still utilize pre-trained models for cardinality estimation, significantly reducing training overheads compared to instance specific models. We are open sourcing our scripts to collect statistics, generate queries and training datasets to foster more extensive research, also from the ML community on the important problem of cardinality estimation and in particular improve on recent directions such as pre-trained cardinality estimation.