Act As a Real Researcher: A Suite of Benchmarks Evaluating Frontier LLMs and Agentic Harnesses in Research Lifecycle

As foundation models advance and agent scaffolding becomes increasingly sophisticated, agents have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in complex, long-horizon coding tasks and even autonomous experiment execution. Despite their evolution from research assistants into autonomous research agents, these systems still exhibit significant limitations in field sensitivity, research ethics, and nuanced scientific judgment. Consequently, frontier agents remain unable to fully replace human researchers. To bridge this gap, we conceptualize the AARR (Act As a Real Researcher) benchmark series. Unlike existing benchmarks that primarily assess macro-level execution capabilities, AARR focuses on whether agents can emulate the professionalism, thoroughness, and nuanced reasoning that characterize human researchers in granular research scenarios. In this work, we propose AARRI-Bench (Act As a Real Research Intern), the first benchmark in this series. We conduct extensive experiments across frontier models and agentic systems, revealing that even the best-performing configuration (Mini-SWE-Agent with Claude Opus 4.7) achieves only 68.3\% success rate, frequently overlooking subtle yet critical details that are obvious to real human researchers. Our results indicate that developing researcher-like AI requires further exploration of research behavior, rather than merely complex scaffolding. Our data is released at https://github.com/AARR-bench/AARRI-bench.

GeoFaith: A Spatio-Temporal Dual View of Faithful Chain-of-Thought

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has advanced large language models (LLMs), but outcome-based supervision leads to pervasive post-hoc rationalization, producing plausible yet unfaithful reasoning chains. Most prior faithfulness assessment methods are either unscalable, expensive, or unreliable. We propose GeoFaith, a spatio-temporal framework that leverages latent geometric structure and entropy dynamics to diagnose and enforce faithful reasoning. We develop a scalable bootstrapping pipeline expanding step-level annotations from 1k to 20k samples across four domains, train an 8B faithfulness detector outperforming GPT-5 on standard benchmarks, and design a faithfulness-aware reinforcement learning framework jointly optimizing outcome correctness, process faithfulness, and trajectory consistency. Experiments show the proposed method achieves superior performance on both faithfulness detection and downstream reasoning, producing shorter, more interpretable chains without sacrificing accuracy. Our code will be made available publicly.

Dual Prototype-Conditioned Diffusion Model for Scalable Multi-Class Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Large Category Spaces

Multi-class anomaly detection aims to build unified models across diverse product categories. However, as the number of categories grows, its performance often degrades due to increasingly complex and heterogeneous normal distributions. To address this challenge, we propose DPDiff-AD, a Dual Prototype-conditioned Diffusion model for large-scale multi-class Anomaly Detection. DPDiff-AD models heterogeneous normal distributions through complementary local and global prototypes. Local prototypes capture representative fine-grained structural patterns via nearest-prototype aggregation, while global prototypes regulate holistic feature geometry through optimal transport regularization. Together, these dual-scale representations define a structured normality space. This space is refined through diffusion-based reconstruction conditioned on both local and global prototypes via prototype-aware attention. By jointly leveraging dual prototypes during generation, DPDiff-AD achieves precise normality modeling, preserves structured separability as category cardinality grows, and enables scalable anomaly discrimination. Extensive experiments across five benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness and scalability of DPDiff-AD. On the 160-category large-scale dataset, it improves image- and pixel-level AUROC by 5.3 and 2.9 points over the previous state-of-the-art method Dinomaly+, while maintaining stable performance as category cardinality increases.

SPD-Faith Bench: Diagnosing and Improving Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought for Multimodal Large Language Models

Chain-of-Thought reasoning is widely used to improve the interpretability of multimodal large language models (MLLMs), yet the faithfulness of the generated reasoning traces remains unclear. Prior work has mainly focused on perceptual hallucinations, leaving reasoning level unfaithfulness underexplored. To isolate faithfulness from linguistic priors, we introduce SPD-Faith Bench, a diagnostic benchmark based on fine-grained image difference reasoning that enforces explicit visual comparison. Evaluations on state-of-the-art MLLMs reveal two systematic failure modes, perceptual blindness and perception-reasoning dissociation. We trace these failures to decaying visual attention and representation shifts in the residual stream. Guided by this analysis, we propose SAGE, a train-free visual evidence-calibrated framework that improves visual routing and aligns reasoning with perception. Our results highlight the importance of explicitly evaluating faithfulness beyond response correctness. Our benchmark and codes are available at https://github.com/Johanson-colab/SPD-Faith-Bench.