Autotuning Apache TVM-based Scientific Applications Using Bayesian Optimization

Apache TVM (Tensor Virtual Machine), an open source machine learning compiler framework designed to optimize computations across various hardware platforms, provides an opportunity to improve the performance of dense matrix factorizations such as LU (Lower Upper) decomposition and Cholesky decomposition on GPUs and AI (Artificial Intelligence) accelerators. In this paper, we propose a new TVM autotuning framework using Bayesian Optimization and use the TVM tensor expression language to implement linear algebra kernels such as LU, Cholesky, and 3mm. We use these scientific computation kernels to evaluate the effectiveness of our methods on a GPU cluster, called Swing, at Argonne National Laboratory. We compare the proposed autotuning framework with the TVM autotuning framework AutoTVM with four tuners and find that our framework outperforms AutoTVM in most cases.

ytopt: Autotuning Scientific Applications for Energy Efficiency at Large Scales

As we enter the exascale computing era, efficiently utilizing power and optimizing the performance of scientific applications under power and energy constraints has become critical and challenging. We propose a low-overhead autotuning framework to autotune performance and energy for various hybrid MPI/OpenMP scientific applications at large scales and to explore the tradeoffs between application runtime and power/energy for energy efficient application execution, then use this framework to autotune four ECP proxy applications -- XSBench, AMG, SWFFT, and SW4lite. Our approach uses Bayesian optimization with a Random Forest surrogate model to effectively search parameter spaces with up to 6 million different configurations on two large-scale production systems, Theta at Argonne National Laboratory and Summit at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The experimental results show that our autotuning framework at large scales has low overhead and achieves good scalability. Using the proposed autotuning framework to identify the best configurations, we achieve up to 91.59% performance improvement, up to 21.2% energy savings, and up to 37.84% EDP improvement on up to 4,096 nodes.

Autotuning PolyBench Benchmarks with LLVM Clang/Polly Loop Optimization Pragmas Using Bayesian Optimization (extended version)

In this paper, we develop a ytopt autotuning framework that leverages Bayesian optimization to explore the parameter space search and compare four different supervised learning methods within Bayesian optimization and evaluate their effectiveness. We select six of the most complex PolyBench benchmarks and apply the newly developed LLVM Clang/Polly loop optimization pragmas to the benchmarks to optimize them. We then use the autotuning framework to optimize the pragma parameters to improve their performance. The experimental results show that our autotuning approach outperforms the other compiling methods to provide the smallest execution time for the benchmarks syr2k, 3mm, heat-3d, lu, and covariance with two large datasets in 200 code evaluations for effectively searching the parameter spaces with up to 170,368 different configurations. We find that the Floyd-Warshall benchmark did not benefit from autotuning because Polly uses heuristics to optimize the benchmark to make it run much slower. To cope with this issue, we provide some compiler option solutions to improve the performance. Then we present loop autotuning without a user's knowledge using a simple mctree autotuning framework to further improve the performance of the Floyd-Warshall benchmark. We also extend the ytopt autotuning framework to tune a deep learning application.

Performance and Power Modeling and Prediction Using MuMMI and Ten Machine Learning Methods

In this paper, we use modeling and prediction tool MuMMI (Multiple Metrics Modeling Infrastructure) and ten machine learning methods to model and predict performance and power and compare their prediction error rates. We use a fault-tolerant linear algebra code and a fault-tolerant heat distribution code to conduct our modeling and prediction study on the Cray XC40 Theta and IBM BG/Q Mira at Argonne National Laboratory and the Intel Haswell cluster Shepard at Sandia National Laboratories. Our experiment results show that the prediction error rates in performance and power using MuMMI are less than 10% for most cases. Based on the models for runtime, node power, CPU power, and memory power, we identify the most significant performance counters for potential optimization efforts associated with the application characteristics and the target architectures, and we predict theoretical outcomes of the potential optimizations. When we compare the prediction accuracy using MuMMI with that using 10 machine learning methods, we observe that MuMMI not only results in more accurate prediction in both performance and power but also presents how performance counters impact the performance and power models. This provides some insights about how to fine-tune the applications and/or systems for energy efficiency.

Utilizing Ensemble Learning for Performance and Power Modeling and Improvement of Parallel Cancer Deep Learning CANDLE Benchmarks

Machine learning (ML) continues to grow in importance across nearly all domains and is a natural tool in modeling to learn from data. Often a tradeoff exists between a model's ability to minimize bias and variance. In this paper, we utilize ensemble learning to combine linear, nonlinear, and tree-/rule-based ML methods to cope with the bias-variance tradeoff and result in more accurate models. Hardware performance counter values are correlated with properties of applications that impact performance and power on the underlying system. We use the datasets collected for two parallel cancer deep learning CANDLE benchmarks, NT3 (weak scaling) and P1B2 (strong scaling), to build performance and power models based on hardware performance counters using single-object and multiple-objects ensemble learning to identify the most important counters for improvement. Based on the insights from these models, we improve the performance and energy of P1B2 and NT3 by optimizing the deep learning environments TensorFlow, Keras, Horovod, and Python under the huge page size of 8 MB on the Cray XC40 Theta at Argonne National Laboratory. Experimental results show that ensemble learning not only produces more accurate models but also provides more robust performance counter ranking. We achieve up to 61.15% performance improvement and up to 62.58% energy saving for P1B2 and up to 55.81% performance improvement and up to 52.60% energy saving for NT3 on up to 24,576 cores.

Autotuning PolyBench Benchmarks with LLVM Clang/Polly Loop Optimization Pragmas Using Bayesian Optimization

An autotuning is an approach that explores a search space of possible implementations/configurations of a kernel or an application by selecting and evaluating a subset of implementations/configurations on a target platform and/or use models to identify a high performance implementation/configuration. In this paper, we develop an autotuning framework that leverages Bayesian optimization to explore the parameter space search. We select six of the most complex benchmarks from the application domains of the PolyBench benchmarks (syr2k, 3mm, heat-3d, lu, covariance, and Floyd-Warshall) and apply the newly developed LLVM Clang/Polly loop optimization pragmas to the benchmarks to optimize them. We then use the autotuning framework to optimize the pragma parameters to improve their performance. The experimental results show that our autotuning approach outperforms the other compiling methods to provide the smallest execution time for the benchmarks syr2k, 3mm, heat-3d, lu, and covariance with two large datasets in 200 code evaluations for effectively searching the parameter spaces with up to 170,368 different configurations. We compare four different supervised learning methods within Bayesian optimization and evaluate their effectiveness. We find that the Floyd-Warshall benchmark did not benefit from autotuning because Polly uses heuristics to optimize the benchmark to make it run much slower. To cope with this issue, we provide some compiler option solutions to improve the performance.