Exploring Flow-Lenia Universes with a Curiosity-driven AI Scientist: Discovering Diverse Ecosystem Dynamics

We present a method for the automated discovery of system-level dynamics in Flow-Lenia$-$a continuous cellular automaton (CA) with mass conservation and parameter localization$-$using a curiosity-driven AI scientist. This method aims to uncover processes leading to self-organization of evolutionary and ecosystemic dynamics in CAs. We build on previous work which uses diversity search algorithms in Lenia to find self-organized individual patterns, and extend it to large environments that support distinct interacting patterns. We adapt Intrinsically Motivated Goal Exploration Processes (IMGEPs) to drive exploration of diverse Flow-Lenia environments using simulation-wide metrics, such as evolutionary activity, compression-based complexity, and multi-scale entropy. We test our method in two experiments, showcasing its ability to illuminate significantly more diverse dynamics compared to random search. We show qualitative results illustrating how ecosystemic simulations enable self-organization of complex collective behaviors not captured by previous individual pattern search and analysis. We complement automated discovery with an interactive exploration tool, creating an effective human-AI collaborative workflow for scientific investigation. Though demonstrated specifically with Flow-Lenia, this methodology provides a framework potentially applicable to other parameterizable complex systems where understanding emergent collective properties is of interest.

Leveraging Model Interpretability and Stability to increase Model Robustness

State of the art Deep Neural Networks (DNN) can now achieve above human level accuracy on image classification tasks. However their outstanding performances come along with a complex inference mechanism making them arduously interpretable models. In order to understand the underlying prediction rules of DNNs, Dhamdhere et al. propose an interpretability method to break down a DNN prediction score as sum of its hidden unit contributions, in the form of a metric called conductance. Analyzing conductances of DNN hidden units, we find out there is a difference in how wrong and correct predictions are inferred. We identify distinguishable patterns of hidden unit activations for wrong and correct predictions. We then use an error detector in the form of a binary classifier on top of the DNN to automatically discriminate wrong and correct predictions of the DNN based on their hidden unit activations. Detected wrong predictions are discarded, increasing the model robustness. A different approach to distinguish wrong and correct predictions of DNNs is proposed by Wang et al. whose method is based on the premise that input samples leading a DNN into making wrong predictions are less stable to the DNN weight changes than correctly classified input samples. In our study, we compare both methods and find out by combining them that better detection of wrong predictions can be achieved.